From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
Cc: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"yangfeng1@kingsoft.com" <yangfeng1@kingsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: non-current task should be checked early_kill for force_early
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:09:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118100928.GA4988@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118173852.0c784aa9.yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:38:52PM +0800, Aili Yao wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:24:23 +0100
> Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > So, the scenario case is a multithread application with the same page mapped.
> > And PF_MCE_KILL_EARLY flag was set.
> >
> The scenario is not related multithread application;
> it's about multiprocess application which share the same page
Ok, I misunderstood that part.
Then, I do not fully understand the concern.
I guess you are kind of memory scrubbing with mcelog defaulting to
memory_failure instead of soft_offline.
E.g: collect_procs_anon will pick the processes which have the MCE policy
set and have the page mapped. That is all we should need.
So, if you have processes A, B, C and D with X page mapped, and you set
the MCE policy on those four, they should get picked up by your scrubbing
when handling X page by memory_failure.
Is not that right?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 7:55 Aili Yao
2021-01-15 8:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-15 9:26 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-15 9:31 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-15 9:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-15 9:53 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-15 10:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-18 5:15 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-01-18 5:57 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-18 6:50 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-01-18 7:16 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-18 8:15 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-18 8:57 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-01-18 9:09 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-19 5:25 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-01-19 6:04 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-19 7:33 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-01-18 9:24 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-01-18 9:38 ` Aili Yao
2021-01-18 10:09 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2021-01-19 4:21 ` Aili Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118100928.GA4988@linux \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=yangfeng1@kingsoft.com \
--cc=yaoaili@kingsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox