* Re: [PATCH v2] fs/proc: Expose RSEQ configuration
[not found] <20210114185445.996-1-figiel@google.com>
@ 2021-01-15 12:23 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2021-01-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Piotr Figiel, Alexey Dobriyan, Eric W. Biederman, Andrew Morton,
Kees Cook, Alexey Gladkov, Christian Brauner, Michel Lespinasse,
Bernd Edlinger, Andrei Vagin
Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux, Linux Memory Management List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8557 bytes --]
Hi Piotr,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on userns/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master hnaz-linux-mm/master v5.11-rc3 next-20210115]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Piotr-Figiel/fs-proc-Expose-RSEQ-configuration/20210115-114533
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r021-20210115 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5b42fd8dd4e7e29125a09a41a33af7c9cb57d144)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/dc5b7016b885415391e9d88d7349de14353c7249
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Piotr-Figiel/fs-proc-Expose-RSEQ-configuration/20210115-114533
git checkout dc5b7016b885415391e9d88d7349de14353c7249
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:78:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:557:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:80:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:558:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:82:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsb
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:559:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:84:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:560:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:86:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:561:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> fs/proc/base.c:674:30: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned ptrdiff_t' (aka 'unsigned int') but the argument has type 'ptrdiff_t' (aka 'long') [-Wformat]
seq_printf(m, "%tx %08x\n", (ptrdiff_t)((uintptr_t)task->rseq),
~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
%lx
7 warnings generated.
vim +674 fs/proc/base.c
665
666 #ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
667 static int proc_pid_rseq(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
668 struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
669 {
670 int res = lock_trace(task);
671
672 if (res)
673 return res;
> 674 seq_printf(m, "%tx %08x\n", (ptrdiff_t)((uintptr_t)task->rseq),
675 task->rseq_sig);
676 unlock_trace(task);
677 return 0;
678 }
679 #endif /* CONFIG_RSEQ */
680 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK */
681
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 25620 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread