From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F87C433DB for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AC922B30 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35AC922B30 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 708886B01AE; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 690D76B01B3; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:11:58 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 57FBE6B01F0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:11:58 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0156.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.156]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11A6B01AE for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0DA180AD817 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:11:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77694439116.09.trees57_12007062750f Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6AA180AD815 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:11:57 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: trees57_12007062750f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4860 Received: from mail-il1-f182.google.com (mail-il1-f182.google.com [209.85.166.182]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 75so179643ilv.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:11:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=810FEXKXHgKArsdDAMgoY00MSSyM0BmX9OCgjLnP4Og=; b=UJTB+Bj11DFpIdm8er17rTscKDWE51w0Xw2dRRyGlLp/iO1XvzF3ESU45wDzK7AgLL KDzHNNcr0gD+4aSNEwy7d3hA0u2nWCIQA2DYbaGf+UeAYwShkiZ+6XXgEPg5aWBKG4Wu sNfwkvLkTFcF4Mjt9QBGXOd/6dSm3eTcjMYKx+Ixf2ZU2fmyqSEmGTiNtZC6wti70BYv VkZfW1ubZkvtjiu8as4xrHA+6DVXD1jDP7IHftAqlADXYweBvB9auFpDwzrWnVdfkAe5 g73Tzg5BbqKTLA6PxoFatGMVIdra+iw66fP1QXBemXrcBZIh7Uq5zHA7VsrIG0HID5Y0 QwqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=810FEXKXHgKArsdDAMgoY00MSSyM0BmX9OCgjLnP4Og=; b=EJmLnXEEP6NmfDy5jFfR1CZeOj/9kSnVN4uvLGM9RywkJaffiuOrMJDFhlcNA7GhxS Uhsamhjl4wki+o/AjjEOF/QyqJ8UgQ9iC/sSLlWTILAwtvwaqbRbnpI0oLT/Um7mmSk3 +Z3JfUGgYg81FKoL938Ph4pJzdF55gBc30tBOHMGGKP292SrizJ6mdgG9JAu9OS93u4p 0IZEBvCPp8vDCcGGC47eqxiIh0oZqd8BeyWQ0QKg2/nPqqS5PKlsnIo6qoxjI618c09a 9iEqMY2j2+vue6eVl1ImOmZwCpzT+13x+qonPVKcH0whPQQ1MWk/HpIGWggkxGuBGt1F sE3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qOJzoTp1gCIDGmFkTDf81rvrDRdnIyNv8TkUzxe+GGkjfuoUl jDxvSsfsAfE/M6ZbFqlv8m4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhbehmXWz3weu+cQnoRjDTjfr+Jz7S4Ow/uhQ6OpqWgtRhziYeTCnADFiQaWp9ee8lKcg0aw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:d2ce:: with SMTP id w14mr628841ilg.182.1610392316821; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ubuntu-m3-large-x86 ([2604:1380:45f1:1d00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 143sm316464ila.4.2021.01.11.11.11.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:11:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:11:54 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Walter Wu , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrew Morton , kasan-dev , Linux Memory Management List , LKML , Linux ARM , wsd_upstream , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: remove redundant config option Message-ID: <20210111191154.GA2941328@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> References: <20210108040940.1138-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> <20210111185902.GA2112090@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:59 PM Nathan Chancellor > wrote: > > > > > > -config KASAN_STACK_ENABLE > > > > +config KASAN_STACK > > > > bool "Enable stack instrumentation (unsafe)" if CC_IS_CLANG && !COMPILE_TEST > > > > > > Does this syntax mean that KASAN_STACK is only present for > > > CC_IS_CLANG? Or that it can only be disabled for CC_IS_CLANG? > > > > It means that the option can only be disabled for clang. > > OK, got it. > > > > Anyway, I think it's better to 1. allow to control KASAN_STACK > > > regardless of the compiler (as it was possible before), and 2. avoid > > > > It has never been possible to control KASAN_STACK for GCC because of the > > bool ... if ... syntax. This patch does not change that logic. Making it > > possible to control KASAN_STACK with GCC seems fine but that is going to > > be a new change that would probably be suited for a new patch on top of > > this one. > > The if syntax was never applied to KASAN_STACK, only to > KASAN_STACK_ENABLE, so it should have been possible (although I've > never specifically tried it). CONFIG_KASAN_STACK was not a user selectable symbol so it was always 1 for GCC. Cheers, Nathan