linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Cc: Kostya Kortchinsky <kostyak@google.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: improve mprotect(R|W) efficiency on pages referenced once
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:34:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201223143411.e889bcad32e5a1c0252c745c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201212053152.3783250-1-pcc@google.com>

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:31:52 -0800 Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> wrote:

> In the Scudo memory allocator [1] we would like to be able to
> detect use-after-free vulnerabilities involving large allocations
> by issuing mprotect(PROT_NONE) on the memory region used for the
> allocation when it is deallocated. Later on, after the memory
> region has been "quarantined" for a sufficient period of time we
> would like to be able to use it for another allocation by issuing
> mprotect(PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE).
> 
> Before this patch, after removing the write protection, any writes
> to the memory region would result in page faults and entering
> the copy-on-write code path, even in the usual case where the
> pages are only referenced by a single PTE, harming performance
> unnecessarily. Make it so that any pages in anonymous mappings that
> are only referenced by a single PTE are immediately made writable
> during the mprotect so that we can avoid the page faults.
> 

I worry that some other application out there does a similar thing, but
only expects to very sparsely write to the area.  It will see a big increase
in mprotect() latency.

Would it be better to implement this as a separate operation, rather
than unconditionally tying it into mprotect()?  Say, a new madvise()
operation?


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-23 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-12  5:31 Peter Collingbourne
2020-12-23 22:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-12-29  2:09   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-12-29 19:25     ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-30  0:43       ` Peter Collingbourne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201223143411.e889bcad32e5a1c0252c745c@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kostyak@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox