From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/4] mm: Add become_kswapd and restore_kswapd
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:06:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201217030609.GP632069@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217011157.92549-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:11:54AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
>
> Since XFS needs to pretend to be kswapd in some of its worker threads,
> create methods to save & restore kswapd state. Don't bother restoring
> kswapd state in kswapd -- the only time we reach this code is when we're
> exiting and the task_struct is about to be destroyed anyway.
>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 ++++++++------
> include/linux/sched/mm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/vmscan.c | 16 +---------------
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index 51dbff9b0908..0f35b7a38e76 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -2813,8 +2813,9 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> {
> struct xfs_btree_split_args *args = container_of(work,
> struct xfs_btree_split_args, work);
> + bool is_kswapd = args->kswapd;
> unsigned long pflags;
> - unsigned long new_pflags = PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS;
> + int memalloc_nofs;
>
> /*
> * we are in a transaction context here, but may also be doing work
> @@ -2822,16 +2823,17 @@ xfs_btree_split_worker(
> * temporarily to ensure that we don't block waiting for memory reclaim
> * in any way.
> */
> - if (args->kswapd)
> - new_pflags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD;
> -
> - current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> + if (is_kswapd)
> + pflags = become_kswapd();
> + memalloc_nofs = memalloc_nofs_save();
>
> args->result = __xfs_btree_split(args->cur, args->level, args->ptrp,
> args->key, args->curp, args->stat);
> complete(args->done);
>
> - current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, new_pflags);
> + memalloc_nofs_restore(memalloc_nofs);
> + if (is_kswapd)
> + restore_kswapd(pflags);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index d5ece7a9a403..2faf03e79a1e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -278,6 +278,29 @@ static inline void memalloc_nocma_restore(unsigned int flags)
> }
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * Tell the memory management code that this thread is working on behalf
> + * of background memory reclaim (like kswapd). That means that it will
> + * get access to memory reserves should it need to allocate memory in
> + * order to make forward progress. With this great power comes great
> + * responsibility to not exhaust those reserves.
> + */
> +#define KSWAPD_PF_FLAGS (PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD)
> +
> +static inline unsigned long become_kswapd(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags = current->flags & KSWAPD_PF_FLAGS;
> +
> + current->flags |= KSWAPD_PF_FLAGS;
> +
> + return flags;
> +}
You can get rid of the empty lines out of this function.
> +static inline void restore_kswapd(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + current->flags &= ~(flags ^ KSWAPD_PF_FLAGS);
> +}
Urk, that requires thinking about to determine whether it is
correct. And it is 3 runtime logic operations (^, ~ and &) too. The
way all the memalloc_*_restore() functions restore the previous
flags is obviously correct and only requires 2 runtime logic
operations because the compiler calculates the ~ operation on the
constant. So why do it differently here? i.e.:
current->flags = (current->flags & ~KSWAPD_PF_FLAGS) | flags;
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3870,19 +3870,7 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
> if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask);
>
> - /*
> - * Tell the memory management that we're a "memory allocator",
> - * and that if we need more memory we should get access to it
> - * regardless (see "__alloc_pages()"). "kswapd" should
> - * never get caught in the normal page freeing logic.
> - *
> - * (Kswapd normally doesn't need memory anyway, but sometimes
> - * you need a small amount of memory in order to be able to
> - * page out something else, and this flag essentially protects
> - * us from recursively trying to free more memory as we're
> - * trying to free the first piece of memory in the first place).
> - */
> - tsk->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD;
> + become_kswapd();
> set_freezable();
>
> WRITE_ONCE(pgdat->kswapd_order, 0);
> @@ -3932,8 +3920,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
> goto kswapd_try_sleep;
> }
>
> - tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD);
> -
Missing a restore_kswapd()?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-17 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 1:11 [PATCH v13 0/4] xfs: avoid transaction reservation recursion Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 1:11 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] mm: Add become_kswapd and restore_kswapd Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 3:06 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-12-17 4:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-17 4:46 ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 1:11 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} in xfs transaction Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 1:11 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] xfs: refactor the usage around xfs_trans_context_{set,clear} Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-17 23:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-18 0:07 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-19 0:31 ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-19 0:28 ` Yafang Shao
2020-12-17 1:11 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] xfs: use current->journal_info to avoid transaction reservation recursion Yafang Shao
2020-12-18 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-19 0:16 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201217030609.GP632069@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox