From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: guro@fb.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, shakeelb@google.com,
david@fromorbit.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: shy828301@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v2 PATCH 3/9] mm: vmscan: guarantee shrinker_slab_memcg() sees valid shrinker_maps for online memcg
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:37:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214223722.232537-4-shy828301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214223722.232537-1-shy828301@gmail.com>
The shrink_slab_memcg() races with mem_cgroup_css_online(). A visibility of CSS_ONLINE flag
in shrink_slab_memcg()->mem_cgroup_online() does not guarantee that we will see
memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_maps != NULL. This may occur because of processor reordering
on !x86.
This seems like the below case:
CPU A CPU B
store shrinker_map load CSS_ONLINE
store CSS_ONLINE load shrinker_map
So the memory ordering could be guaranteed by smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() pair.
The memory barriers pair will guarantee the ordering between shrinker_deferred and CSS_ONLINE
for the following patches as well.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 7 +++++++
mm/vmscan.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ed942734235f..3d4ddbb84a01 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5406,6 +5406,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ /*
+ * Barrier for CSS_ONLINE, so that shrink_slab_memcg() sees shirnker_maps
+ * and shrinker_deferred before CSS_ONLINE. It pairs with the read barrier
+ * in shrink_slab_memcg().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+
/* Online state pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins CSS */
refcount_set(&memcg->id.ref, 1);
css_get(css);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 912c044301dd..9b31b9c419ec 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -552,13 +552,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
return 0;
+ /* Pairs with write barrier in mem_cgroup_css_online() */
+ smp_rmb();
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
return 0;
+ /* Once memcg is online it can't be NULL */
map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
true);
- if (unlikely(!map))
- goto unlock;
for_each_set_bit(i, map->map, shrinker_nr_max) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
@@ -612,7 +614,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
break;
}
}
-unlock:
+
up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
return freed;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 22:37 [RFC v2 PATCH 0/9] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 1/9] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 2/9] mm: memcontrol: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Yang Shi
2020-12-15 2:09 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 13:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-16 13:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-16 19:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-16 21:56 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-16 19:39 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-15 14:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 20:32 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2020-12-15 2:04 ` [v2 PATCH 3/9] mm: vmscan: guarantee shrinker_slab_memcg() sees valid shrinker_maps for online memcg Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <20201215123802.GA379720@cmpxchg.org>
2020-12-15 12:58 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-15 17:14 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <CAHbLzkrzv48S3ks-x8M=2sHxRS_+c-hLXdt4ScaWD6mC4ZFe8w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-12-28 20:03 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 4/9] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 5/9] mm: memcontrol: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2020-12-15 2:22 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 14:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 21:57 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 6/9] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2020-12-15 2:46 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 22:27 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 7/9] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2020-12-15 3:05 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:07 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-18 0:56 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-18 1:09 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 8/9] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2020-12-15 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:10 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 9/9] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Yang Shi
2020-12-15 3:23 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:59 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201214223722.232537-4-shy828301@gmail.com \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox