From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: bail out from psi memstall when cond_resched
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:55:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119125557.GM3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605669776-24242-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:22:56AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> Memory reclaiming will run as several seconds in memory constraint system, which
> will be deemed as heavy memstall. Have the memory reclaim be more presiced by
> bailing out when cond_resched
How is this supposed to work on PREEMPT=y where cond_resched() is a NOP
and you can get preempted at any random point?
(leaving the rest for Johannes)
> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a815f73..a083c85 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ static inline bool memcg_congested(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline void psi_cond_resched(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long *flags;
> +
> + if (current->flags & PF_MEMSTALL)
> + psi_memstall_leave(&flags);
> + cond_resched();
> + psi_memstall_enter(&flags);
> +}
> /*
> * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters.
> * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is
> @@ -557,7 +566,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> total_scan -= shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
> scanned += shrinkctl->nr_scanned;
>
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
> }
>
> if (next_deferred >= scanned)
> @@ -714,7 +723,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
>
> up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> out:
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
> return freed;
> }
>
> @@ -1109,7 +1118,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> unsigned nr_reclaimed = 0;
>
> memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat));
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
>
> while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
> struct address_space *mapping;
> @@ -1118,7 +1127,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN;
> bool dirty, writeback;
>
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
>
> page = lru_to_page(page_list);
> list_del(&page->lru);
> @@ -2084,7 +2093,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>
> while (!list_empty(&l_hold)) {
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
> page = lru_to_page(&l_hold);
> list_del(&page->lru);
>
> @@ -2500,7 +2509,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc
> }
> }
>
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
>
> if (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim || scan_adjusted)
> continue;
> @@ -4149,7 +4158,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
> .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
> };
>
> - cond_resched();
> + psi_cond_resched();
> fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
> /*
> * We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_UNMAP
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 3:22 Zhaoyang Huang
2020-11-19 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-19 18:24 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119125557.GM3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox