From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] block: remove the nr_sects field in struct hd_struct
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:05:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119120525.GW1981@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118084800.2339180-15-hch@lst.de>
On Wed 18-11-20 09:47:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now that the hd_struct always has a block device attached to it, there is
> no need for having two size field that just get out of sync.
>
> Additional the field in hd_struct did not use proper serializiation,
> possibly allowing for torn writes. By only using the block_device field
> this problem also gets fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Overall the patch looks good but I have a couple of comments below.
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index fa01bef35bb1fe..0c5269997434d6 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ void guard_bio_eod(struct bio *bio)
> rcu_read_lock();
> part = __disk_get_part(bio->bi_disk, bio->bi_partno);
> if (part)
> - maxsector = part_nr_sects_read(part);
> + maxsector = bdev_nr_sectors(part->bdev);
> else
> maxsector = get_capacity(bio->bi_disk);
I have to say that after these changes I find it a bit confusing that we
have get/set_capacity() and bdev_nr_sectors() / bdev_set_nr_sectors() and
they are all the same thing (i_size of the bdev). Is there a reason for the
distinction?
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 94de95287a6370..e101b6843f7437 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ static void disk_add_events(struct gendisk *disk);
> static void disk_del_events(struct gendisk *disk);
> static void disk_release_events(struct gendisk *disk);
>
> +void set_capacity(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sectors)
> +{
> + struct block_device *bdev = disk->part0.bdev;
> +
> + spin_lock(&bdev->bd_size_lock);
> + i_size_write(bdev->bd_inode, (loff_t)sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + spin_unlock(&bdev->bd_size_lock);
AFAICT bd_size_lock is pointless after these changes so we can just remove
it?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_capacity);
> +
> /*
> * Set disk capacity and notify if the size is not currently zero and will not
> * be set to zero. Returns true if a uevent was sent, otherwise false.
> @@ -47,11 +57,12 @@ bool set_capacity_and_notify(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t size)
> sector_t capacity = get_capacity(disk);
>
> set_capacity(disk, size);
> - revalidate_disk_size(disk, true);
>
> if (capacity != size && capacity != 0 && size != 0) {
> char *envp[] = { "RESIZE=1", NULL };
>
> + pr_info("%s: detected capacity change from %lld to %lld\n",
> + disk->disk_name, size, capacity);
So we are now missing above message for transitions from / to 0 capacity?
Is there any other notification in the kernel log when e.g. media is
inserted into a CD-ROM drive? I remember using these messages for detecting
that...
Also what about GENHD_FL_HIDDEN devices? Are we sure we never set capacity
for them?
> kobject_uevent_env(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> return true;
> }
...
> @@ -983,7 +994,7 @@ void __init printk_all_partitions(void)
>
> printk("%s%s %10llu %s %s", is_part0 ? "" : " ",
> bdevt_str(part_devt(part), devt_buf),
> - (unsigned long long)part_nr_sects_read(part) >> 1
> + bdev_nr_sectors(part->bdev) >> 1
> , disk_name(disk, part->partno, name_buf),
> part->info ? part->info->uuid : "");
> if (is_part0) {
> @@ -1076,7 +1087,7 @@ static int show_partition(struct seq_file *seqf, void *v)
> while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> seq_printf(seqf, "%4d %7d %10llu %s\n",
> MAJOR(part_devt(part)), MINOR(part_devt(part)),
> - (unsigned long long)part_nr_sects_read(part) >> 1,
> + bdev_nr_sectors(part->bdev) >> 1,
> disk_name(sgp, part->partno, buf));
> disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
>
> @@ -1158,8 +1169,7 @@ ssize_t part_size_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct hd_struct *p = dev_to_part(dev);
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n",
> - (unsigned long long)part_nr_sects_read(p));
> + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", bdev_nr_sectors(p->bdev));
Is sector_t really guaranteed to be unsigned long long?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 8:47 merge struct block_device and " Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 01/20] blk-cgroup: fix a hd_struct leak in blkcg_fill_root_iostats Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:09 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-24 12:26 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 02/20] block: remove a duplicate __disk_get_part prototype Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:10 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 03/20] block: add a bdev_kobj helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 04/20] block: use disk_part_iter_exit in disk_part_iter_next Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:19 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 05/20] block: use put_device in put_disk Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:20 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 06/20] block: change the hash used for looking up block devices Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:22 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 07/20] init: refactor name_to_dev_t Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:37 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 8:25 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-20 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 8:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 08/20] init: refactor devt_from_partuuid Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:41 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 09/20] init: cleanup match_dev_by_uuid and match_dev_by_label Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:42 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 8:38 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 10/20] block: refactor __blkdev_put Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 14:46 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 11/20] block: reference struct block_device from struct hd_struct Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 9:41 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-20 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-25 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-25 12:09 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 12/20] block: simplify the block device claiming interface Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 10:07 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 13/20] block: remove ->bd_contains Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 10:32 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-20 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 14/20] block: remove the nr_sects field in struct hd_struct Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 12:05 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-11-20 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-20 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-20 15:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-20 15:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-20 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-20 20:05 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-21 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 15/20] block: merge struct block_device and " Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 14:39 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-20 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-20 10:53 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 16/20] block: stop using bdget_disk for partition 0 Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 14:43 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 17/20] filemap: consistently use ->f_mapping over ->i_mapping Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 14:53 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-19 15:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-20 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 18/20] fs: remove get_super_thawed and get_super_exclusive_thawed Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-19 14:59 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-18 8:47 ` [PATCH 19/20] bcache: remove a superflous lookup_bdev all Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:54 ` Coly Li
2020-11-18 9:10 ` Greg KH
2020-11-18 9:55 ` Coly Li
2020-11-18 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:48 ` [PATCH 20/20] block: remove i_bdev Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 8:56 ` merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct Jan Beulich
2020-11-18 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 9:04 ` Jan Beulich
2020-11-18 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-18 9:09 ` Greg KH
2020-11-18 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2020-11-18 9:32 ` Greg KH
2020-11-18 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-18 9:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119120525.GW1981@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox