From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:40:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117034108.1186569-11-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117034108.1186569-1-guro@fb.com>
Account memory used by cgroup storage maps including metadata
structures.
Account the percpu memory for the percpu flavor of cgroup storage.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 571bb351ed3b..212d6dbbc39a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static int cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
new = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_storage_buffer) +
map->value_size,
- __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN |
+ __GFP_ACCOUNT,
map->numa_node);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
map = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map),
- __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER, numa_node);
+ __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT, numa_node);
if (!map) {
bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -496,9 +497,9 @@ static size_t bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(struct bpf_map *map, u32 *pages)
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype)
{
+ const gfp_t gfp = __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
struct bpf_map *map;
- gfp_t flags;
size_t size;
u32 pages;
@@ -511,20 +512,18 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (bpf_map_charge_memlock(map, pages))
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
- storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage),
- __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER, map->numa_node);
+ storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage), gfp,
+ map->numa_node);
if (!storage)
goto enomem;
- flags = __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER;
-
if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED) {
- storage->buf = kmalloc_node(size, flags, map->numa_node);
+ storage->buf = kmalloc_node(size, gfp, map->numa_node);
if (!storage->buf)
goto enomem;
check_and_init_map_lock(map, storage->buf->data);
} else {
- storage->percpu_buf = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, flags);
+ storage->percpu_buf = __alloc_percpu_gfp(size, 8, gfp);
if (!storage->percpu_buf)
goto enomem;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 3:40 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <41eb5e5b-e651-4cb3-a6ea-9ff6b8aa41fb@iogearbox.net>
2020-11-18 0:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-18 1:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-18 1:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-18 1:28 ` Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <43c845d6-ea33-0d9d-98bb-e743af4940a3@iogearbox.net>
2020-11-18 17:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201117034108.1186569-11-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox