From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: enable slab memory accounting atomically
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:21:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110152143.GA842337@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110010615.1273043-1-guro@fb.com>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:06:15PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Many kernel memory accounting paths are guarded by the
> memcg_kmem_enabled_key static key. It changes it's state during
> the onlining of the first non-root cgroup. However is doesn't
> happen atomically: before all call sites will become patched
> some charges/uncharges can be skipped, resulting in an unbalanced
> charge. The problem is mostly a theoretical issue, unlikely
> having a noticeable impact ion the real life.
memcg_online_kmem() is called from .css_alloc rather than .css_online,
at a time where memcg is brandnew and the css hasn't been set up and
published yet (the refcount isn't even initialized for css_tryget()).
I don't really see how charges could race with that.
We may want to rename memcg_online_kmem() to memcg_alloc_kmem() or
something.
> Before the rework of the slab controller we relied at setting
> kmemcg_id after enabling the memcg_kmem_enabled_key static key.
> Now we can use the setting of memcg->objcg to enable the slab
> memory accounting atomically.
I suspect that code comment has been out of date since commit
0b8f73e104285a4badf9d768d1c39b06d77d1f97.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 1:06 Roman Gushchin
2020-11-10 15:21 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2020-11-10 16:34 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110152143.GA842337@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox