From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A530CC2D0A3 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1B92236F for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SM5hm/s/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B1B92236F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id ACC746B005C; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:32:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A7BC46B005D; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:32:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 944AD6B0068; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:32:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0087.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.87]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6210E6B005C for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:32:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7B68249980 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:32:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77444406186.16.drug23_2c0e7d8272bb Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF37100E6903 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:32:33 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: drug23_2c0e7d8272bb X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4590 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id t6so9190940plq.11 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:32:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0Rflj5FeVFQvvR71X1g+Z0EkePu6R/sIbeOUdmV31Zo=; b=SM5hm/s/rUbBqvOtec7WpIsvEOMJPkG934FXjlJcEmBErrV8eJeFro3qH2XeaSIzZy vN6NJlmKIWtxmUfYzOWd6k36JMaF/+tRiMDavvHwJlYQvvtyJQzNo4WMp3RSmR1xSGwY rSTkSeyQeId5RJaJS1LCnpo134QaLxaYNvv1RqScfZFO0kkHebOHk+6gosud/2dzZEer nldUB9sQt32LyCSeC5Dd+bwYHUpzqGXRfHbk6W8hXYc3nGw/ANWmO6h6LnBumcLVAgon /OZB2GUSWXzAwz/qL9wOS1WGPtO/wnulhCS2HfhNr1U9noCdzBTDCRdqBLTqIATtdxLc UlwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0Rflj5FeVFQvvR71X1g+Z0EkePu6R/sIbeOUdmV31Zo=; b=X2cFrA+zrpHnBWfnHJ46yNUosTWiuxnJRJecPTyf0g/y8xxpY1BxG3xWsDVSRDHrIc 81lIkxKhYFWcGwkuJkOaKUHxQWWEXL8/HLwCmTymn++cgMjUfgpAgKCIlY5DwsRjh0xf WgekxZSKv3Pum5wEz9zb5FwSvu7rOzXcD/QbDVC9sZs4LkOWOUKx1s68m1sYpIb/Wxrt 6dGQL57d45rXFry+z9D86cpbfjIOzB5PFL8CF9q3vQpO1ISEW++MAhm1LyGDMJjHFVxj qGV5e+a6fd651DIydJrpajdzmYhHMQ6OhHLwML5jhmPrpYrXffghsDOmsOXVKtpND8i3 yJ5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UHH1eO0hP7NDgMVrA1Fp58Jrxl3t5GVqLfyLt1lHcoBTSo1mJ qGAQPAlii7i1oLAkWshrtuc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfymqYguZC9tMMm4xPTSJq8KyM1kPmTukDkHGwybfrB40JI6+eLDF4l0XvD9SuZiCqxA26YA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa97:b029:d5:ac09:c5ec with SMTP id d23-20020a170902aa97b02900d5ac09c5ecmr26100575plr.78.1604439152426; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:7220:84ff:fe09:5e58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm91190pjq.17.2020.11.03.13.32.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:32:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:32:28 -0800 From: Minchan Kim To: Michal Hocko Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Rik van Riel , Christian Brauner , Oleg Nesterov , Tim Murray , kernel-team , LKML , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC]: userspace memory reaping Message-ID: <20201103213228.GB1631979@google.com> References: <20201014120937.GC4440@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201015092030.GB22589@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201103093550.GE21990@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201103093550.GE21990@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:35:50AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 02-11-20 12:29:24, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > [...] > > To follow up on this. Should I post an RFC implementing SIGKILL_SYNC > > which in addition to sending a kill signal would also reap the > > victim's mm in the context of the caller? Maybe having some code will > > get the discussion moving forward? > > Yeah, having a code, even preliminary, might help here. This definitely > needs a good to go from process management people as that proper is land > full of surprises... Just to remind a idea I suggested to reuse existing concept fd = pidfd_open(victim process) fdatasync(fd); close(fd);