From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDEEC2D0A3 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A10820870 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="iBlhfTPN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A10820870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id AFC616B005D; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 14:52:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AACCE6B006C; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 14:52:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 99B506B006E; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 14:52:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0229.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.229]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D64C6B005D for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 14:52:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145821EE6 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77436896880.08.screw32_5f006be272aa Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D6F1819E772 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:39 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: screw32_5f006be272aa X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2276 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=UpbRQYzHYbL4xPaGYfXrPvw9eVridnN8jRYW8ThbdIo=; b=iBlhfTPNSBb2lYpYV5ISwdzqW/ djQhm1PUD8QQ9sWwL/ZLKgFsQePX2OxgcI2x5DJDGEpU0UI7qloLDI49qFa2oAPwrESUdGQyiX/5t pX2YvQ7Z0j0RXG0AcVHZb/zGZmJV7R5To/jEjzFdBu4VV0YicrBDtYw3PXucP9SrdvpzEn6Zq5+Sa uTRUULhN67h6SbUfPRnenckyZAtaypoMlxBcSBtyLHCfbf/nr/JBXqqnK9VQFg2cnPMi+KPno0s7s DMKjssYTLIS+mTO6LUg7zMRV0MLiPmicoFHVc3PnLoaNluYnA9vtsismTb/RU8+MetBgd4th+q9bU lNBb9oqw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kZJOi-0007i7-0L; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:52:16 +0000 Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 19:52:15 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Arvind Sankar Cc: kernel test robot , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , Nick Desaulniers , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , stable@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Move barrier() back into compiler-*.h Message-ID: <20201101195215.GE27442@casper.infradead.org> References: <202010312104.Dk9VQJYb-lkp@intel.com> <20201101173105.1723648-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <20201101173835.GC27442@casper.infradead.org> <20201101195110.GA1751707@rani.riverdale.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201101195110.GA1751707@rani.riverdale.lan> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000008, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:51:10PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote: > Ok. So I still send it as a separate patch and he does the folding, or > should I send a revised patch that replaces the original one? I think Randy's patch should be merged instead of this patch.