From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: reorganize internal_get_user_pages_fast()
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:15:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027131509.GU36674@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027093301.GA16090@quack2.suse.cz>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:33:01AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 23-10-20 21:44:17, John Hubbard wrote:
> > On 10/23/20 5:19 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > + start += (unsigned long)nr_pinned << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > + pages += nr_pinned;
> > > + ret = __gup_longterm_unlocked(start, nr_pages - nr_pinned, gup_flags,
> > > + pages);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > /* Have to be a bit careful with return values */
> >
> > ...and can we move that comment up one level, so that it reads:
> >
> > /* Have to be a bit careful with return values */
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > if (nr_pinned)
> > return nr_pinned;
> > return ret;
> > }
> > return ret + nr_pinned;
> >
> > Thinking about this longer term, it would be nice if the whole gup/pup API
> > set just stopped pretending that anyone cares about partial success, because
> > they *don't*. If we had return values of "0 or -ERRNO" throughout, and an
> > additional set of API wrappers that did some sort of limited retry just like
> > some of the callers do, that would be a happier story.
>
> Actually there are callers that care about partial success. See e.g.
> iov_iter_get_pages() usage in fs/direct_io.c:dio_refill_pages() or
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages(). These places handle partial success just fine and
> not allowing partial success from GUP could regress things...
I looked through a bunch of call sites, and there are a wack that
actually do only want a complete return and are carrying a bunch of
code to fix it:
pvec = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pvec)
return -ENOMEM;
do {
unsigned num_pages = npages - pinned;
uint64_t ptr = userptr->ptr + pinned * PAGE_SIZE;
struct page **pages = pvec + pinned;
ret = pin_user_pages_fast(ptr, num_pages,
!userptr->ro ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, pages);
if (ret < 0) {
unpin_user_pages(pvec, pinned);
kvfree(pvec);
return ret;
}
pinned += ret;
} while (pinned < npages);
Is really a lot better if written as:
pvec = kvmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pvec)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = pin_user_pages_fast(userptr->ptr, npages, FOLL_COMPLETE |
(!userptr->ro ? FOLL_WRITE : 0),
pvec);
if (ret) {
kvfree(pvec);
return ret;
}
(eg FOLL_COMPLETE says to return exactly npages or fail)
Some code assumes things work that way already anyhow:
/* Pin user pages for DMA Xfer */
err = pin_user_pages_unlocked(user_dma.uaddr, user_dma.page_count,
dma->map, FOLL_FORCE);
if (user_dma.page_count != err) {
IVTV_DEBUG_WARN("failed to map user pages, returned %d instead of %d\n",
err, user_dma.page_count);
if (err >= 0) {
unpin_user_pages(dma->map, err);
return -EINVAL;
}
return err;
}
Actually I'm quite surprised I didn't find too many missing the tricky
unpin_user_pages() on the error path - eg
videobuf_dma_init_user_locked() is wrong.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-24 0:19 [PATCH 0/2] Add a 'seqcount' between gup_fast and copy_page_range Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-24 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: reorganize internal_get_user_pages_fast() Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-24 4:44 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-26 23:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-27 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2020-10-27 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 6:00 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-27 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-10-28 6:00 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-28 6:05 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-24 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: prevent gup_fast from racing with COW during fork Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-24 5:19 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-24 5:31 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-26 23:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-27 0:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-27 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-27 0:35 ` John Hubbard
2020-10-27 7:32 ` John Hubbard
2020-11-02 3:25 ` [mm] e498078ae9: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -1.4% regression kernel test robot
2020-10-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add a 'seqcount' between gup_fast and copy_page_range John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027131509.GU36674@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox