linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: mark async iocb read as NOWAIT once some data has been, copied
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:03:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020190343.GA398685@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6e8331e-9d64-0f9a-1a83-5cff13cbc4cb@kernel.dk>

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 02:07:26PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Once we've copied some data for an iocb that is marked with IOCB_WAITQ,
> we should no longer attempt to async lock a new page.

It could be useful to elaborate on the (user-visible) failure scenario
here a bit, as I don't think it's obvious.

> Instead make sure we return the copied amount, and let the caller
> retry, instead of returning -EIOCBQUEUED for a new page.

We *wouldn't* return -EIOCBQUEUED, though, would we? We'd do the async
path, put the caller on a waitqueue, but then return `written' instead
of letting it know.

> @@ -2199,6 +2199,14 @@ ssize_t generic_file_buffered_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
>  	last_index = (*ppos + iter->count + PAGE_SIZE-1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	offset = *ppos & ~PAGE_MASK;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If we've already successfully copied some data, then we
> +	 * can no longer safely return -EIOCBQUEUED. Hence mark
> +	 * an async read NOWAIT at that point.
> +	 */
> +	if (written && (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ))
> +		iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;

That looks correct to me, FWIW. It took a second to verify with all
spaghetti in this function :-) But the ra/!uptodate path already has
its own guard, and this is needed for the readpage fallback.


      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-20 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-17 20:07 Jens Axboe
2020-10-20 19:03 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201020190343.GA398685@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox