From: "Ricardo Cañuelo" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel@collabora.com, hch@lst.de,
guro@fb.com, rientjes@google.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, pmladek@suse.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: enable rate-limiting controls for oom dumps
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:23:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201013092339.225lb62rs7jwfzd6@rcn-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012151804.GG29725@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
Thanks for reviewing the patch and for your suggestions:
On lun 12-10-2020 17:18:04, Michal Hocko wrote:
> How does controling burst and interval solve the problem? Btw. this
> should be a part of the changelog which should explain not only what but
> also why the change is needed.
>
> It is true that the oom report can generate a lot of output. This is
> something that is brought up for quite some time. The largest part of
> the output tends to be the list of tasks and this seems to be the case
> for you as well. Is the list of tasks so important that you need to have
> it in the log? If not you can simply disable this part of the log
> altogether by /proc/sys/vm/oom_dump_tasks.
That could be another way to mitigate the problem, although losing some
information. I'll try to come up with a better alternative.
Cheers,
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-09 9:30 Ricardo Cañuelo
2020-10-12 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-13 9:23 ` Ricardo Cañuelo [this message]
2020-10-13 11:56 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-12 15:22 ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-12 15:41 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-13 0:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-10-13 7:25 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-13 9:02 ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-13 10:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-10-15 13:05 ` Petr Mladek
2020-10-13 9:18 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201013092339.225lb62rs7jwfzd6@rcn-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox