From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make device private reference counts zero based
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:53:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201009165350.GV2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008172544.29905-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 10:25:44AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> ZONE_DEVICE struct pages have an extra reference count that complicates the
> code for put_page() and several places in the kernel that need to check the
> reference count to see that a page is not being used (gup, compaction,
> migration, etc.). Clean up the code so the reference count doesn't need to
> be treated specially for device private pages, leaving DAX as still being
> a special case.
What about the check in mc_handle_swap_pte()?
mm/memcontrol.c:
5513 /*
5514 * MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE means ZONE_DEVICE page and which have
5515 * a refcount of 1 when free (unlike normal page)
5516 */
5517 if (!page_ref_add_unless(page, 1, 1))
5518 return NULL;
... does that need to change? Perhaps just the comment?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
[snip]
>
> void put_devmap_managed_page(struct page *page);
> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
> index e151a7f10519..bf92a261fa6f 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
> @@ -509,10 +509,15 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
> mdevice->devmem_count * (DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE / (1024 * 1024)),
> pfn_first, pfn_last);
>
> + /*
> + * Pages are created with an initial reference count of one but should
> + * have a reference count of zero while in the free state.
> + */
> spin_lock(&mdevice->lock);
> for (pfn = pfn_first; pfn < pfn_last; pfn++) {
> struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> + set_page_count(page, 0);
This confuses me. How does this and init_page_count() not confuse the buddy
allocator? Don't you have to reset the refcount somewhere after the test?
> page->zone_device_data = mdevice->free_pages;
> mdevice->free_pages = page;
> }
> @@ -561,7 +566,7 @@ static struct page *dmirror_devmem_alloc_page(struct dmirror_device *mdevice)
> }
>
> dpage->zone_device_data = rpage;
> - get_page(dpage);
> + init_page_count(dpage);
> lock_page(dpage);
> return dpage;
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index c43ccdddb0f6..e1443b73aa9b 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index 0eb057141a04..93d880c6f73c 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -116,12 +116,11 @@ static void __put_compound_page(struct page *page)
> void __put_page(struct page *page)
> {
> if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
> - put_dev_pagemap(page->pgmap);
> -
> /*
> * The page belongs to the device that created pgmap. Do
> * not return it to page allocator.
> */
> + free_zone_device_page(page);
I really like this.
Ira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 17:25 Ralph Campbell
2020-10-09 16:53 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-10-09 17:23 ` Ralph Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201009165350.GV2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox