From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84606C47425 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0036620848 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IQ0Q7Hih" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0036620848 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 473326B005D; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:32:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3FC486B0062; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:32:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2C4796B0068; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:32:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0003.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9556B005D for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:32:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE5824999B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:32:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77324352882.25.part23_1516a7f2719e Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A9C1804E3A8 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:32:21 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: part23_1516a7f2719e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5267 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com (mail-lf1-f66.google.com [209.85.167.66]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y11so23952lfl.5 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YnQw5I7E0IE6Jm9/sjhCU27Hvf+BvkH1b7yFmJGMXJk=; b=IQ0Q7HihNmj2N5gtPNicajIxU3n0fnaxqryKbRbt6ce7eRM0pbTr8HZLRz3+spOa1N fppFiOHxIf8sg0OuN4Wqru3+khhlkn4eYqy8tt97TfZ2WY3Nu5Pd1vPeRHMAg4ZZrfiW Wjy3MyK2RYM3c/znLxcqU2omMUhRpo7eO0nagsFktLt6/HgzZVxamu88gEWRC/fKHPp/ v80LAcDmsu4iAELmIXZtTDLS9nnndOJIs0i/DLuH9B7E6W+1kKJb456TZv8SOxT/tna4 lh+KzSDq/RXhwvH5yZvxoqLEkRifzyaEDOxmomenDOWqhK0OXarCMmsAWDLYpCthz5z2 7ujQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YnQw5I7E0IE6Jm9/sjhCU27Hvf+BvkH1b7yFmJGMXJk=; b=AkNyP64/tRg9fucpU/htPrmwTyxH8VIlhZKVsSv/QleCB/rjMnpBy1A1Ge16LROFcL ku7L/dfFaU87Pk1VaMAKf1qVkvRJERAtlfszjdZk5PitsuR3clM7ABk+9a+lITGAnGM7 m0F0rvBHNqPoeCRarn851NWM9efzVSZihGeHnLsoP6q/LyyXl4eWXigZsjQNF7TGn4hH vxHCJeZbQWlnLr+49X68KnTsx5RUxxiratlOymh6OQ/p9MHxFPdB9jKm5kzJrSjXqPEY WNjN9nZgWMxYneunFECw5Hwpp8zVxmUF4QSJvQHql19oy/IqhHUoYZhy2lsAVdNAfw9K y+8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313XqMl/Qsp3Wwk7Y9BOYtPxyMI9lipnP3vDe4L8nktm1zrokPR ztilqOjdqHrE8AaUI+ncdbI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwK1VkXLr9O8cmPF9oZr1DmAe5rL061I7HgPBONZTvCYAgvdKSgfytjnPxT/UHZUjVt/taz0A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:403:: with SMTP id u3mr3015161lfk.10.1601580739284; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm669191lfo.197.2020.10.01.12.32.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 21:32:16 +0200 To: Michal Hocko Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , Vlastimil Babka , LKML , RCU , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E . McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Joel Fernandes , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH 2/4] mm: Add __rcu_alloc_page_lockless() func. Message-ID: <20201001193216.GB29606@pc636> References: <20200918194817.48921-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200918194817.48921-3-urezki@gmail.com> <38f42ca1-ffcd-04a6-bf11-618deffa897a@suse.cz> <20200929220742.GB8768@pc636> <20200930103557.GQ2277@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200930103557.GQ2277@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:35:57PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 30-09-20 00:07:42, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > [...] > > > > bool is_pcp_cache_empty(gfp_t gfp) > > { > > struct per_cpu_pages *pcp; > > struct zoneref *ref; > > unsigned long flags; > > bool empty; > > > > ref = first_zones_zonelist(node_zonelist( > > numa_node_id(), gfp), gfp_zone(gfp), NULL); > > if (!ref->zone) > > return true; > > > > local_irq_save(flags); > > pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(ref->zone->pageset)->pcp; > > empty = list_empty(&pcp->lists[gfp_migratetype(gfp)]); > > local_irq_restore(flags); > > > > return empty; > > } > > > > disable_irq(); > > if (!is_pcp_cache_empty(GFP_NOWAIT)) > > __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT); > > enable_irq(); > > > > > > Do you mean to have something like above? I mean some extra API > > function that returns true or false if fast-fast allocation can > > either occur or not. Above code works just fine and never touches > > main zone->lock. > > The above code works with the _current_ implementation and it restricts > its implementation to some degree. Future changes might get harder to > implement with a pattern like this. I do not think we want users to be > aware of internal implementation details like pcp caches, migrate types > or others. While pcp caches are here for years and unlikely to change in > a foreseeable future many details are changing on regular basis. > I see your view. That was en example for better understanding. Thanks. -- Vlad Rezki