From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=/8ty=DA=kvack.org=owner-linux-mm@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE81C2D0A8
	for <linux-mm@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719A12311E
	for <linux-mm@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 719A12311E
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix)
	id 6454C6B0003; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40)
	id 5F38F6B005A; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org
Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042)
	id 508A26B005C; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.89])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386E46B0003
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251])
	by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E02181AEF07
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-FDA: 77294392140.04.rest33_210841d27156
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251])
	by smtpin04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D08009659;
	Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-HE-Tag: rest33_210841d27156
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2748
Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [195.92.253.2])
	by imf37.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:23:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1kL4jW-004YbY-CV; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:22:54 +0000
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:22:54 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag
Message-ID: <20200923132254.GI3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <563138b5-7073-74bc-f0c5-b2bad6277e87@gmail.com>
 <486c92d0-0f2e-bd61-1ab8-302524af5e08@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrW3rwGsgfLNnu_0JAcL5jvrPVTLTWM3JpbB5P9Hye6Fdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d5c6736a-2cb4-4e22-78da-a667bda5c05a@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrUEC81va8-fuUXG1uA5rbKxnKDYsDOXC70_HtKD4LAeAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e0a1b4d1-ff47-18d1-d535-c62812cb3105@gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a2-6JNS38EbZcLrk=cTT526oP=Rf0aoqWNSJ-k4XTYehQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <f25b4708-eba6-78d6-03f9-5bfb04e07627@gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a39jN+t2hhLg0oKZnbYATQXmYE2-Z1JkmFyc1EPdg1HXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <91209170-dcb4-d9ee-afa0-a819f8877b86@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <91209170-dcb4-d9ee-afa0-a819f8877b86@gmail.com>
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:01:34AM +0300, Pavel Begunkov wrote:

> > I'm not following why that would be considered a valid option,
> > as that clearly breaks existing users that update from a 32-bit
> > kernel to a 64-bit one.
> 
> Do you mean users who move 32-bit binaries (without recompiling) to a
> new x64 kernel? Does the kernel guarantees that to work?

Yes.

No further (printable) comments for now...