From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41D0C4727C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DC62399A for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36DC62399A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C8436900015; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C0C9690000A; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AD51E900015; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0026.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F60690000A for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5362C181AC9CB for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:25 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77291169690.30.lead45_43157532714f Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32734180B3C8B for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:25 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: lead45_43157532714f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2388 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gaia (unknown [31.124.44.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFA01208A9; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:04:19 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Dave Martin Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Szabolcs Nagy , Andrey Konovalov , Kevin Brodsky , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vincenzo Frascino , Peter Collingbourne , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 29/29] arm64: mte: Add Memory Tagging Extension documentation Message-ID: <20200922160418.GG15643@gaia> References: <20200904103029.32083-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20200904103029.32083-30-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20200917081107.GA29031@willie-the-truck> <20200917090229.GA10662@gaia> <20200917161550.GA6642@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200917161550.GA6642@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:15:53PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:02:30AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 09:11:08AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Wasn't there a man page kicking around too? Would be good to see that > > > go upstream (to the manpages project, of course). > > > > Dave started writing one for the tagged address ABI, not sure where that > > is. For the MTE additions, we are waiting for the ABI to be upstreamed. > > The tagged address ABI control stuff is upstream in the man-pages-5.08 > release. > > I don't think anyone drafted anything for MTE yet. Do we consider the > MTE ABI to be sufficiently stable now for it to be worth starting > drafting something? Yes, the ABI is stable. The patches are in linux-next and, unless something broken is found, we aim for 5.10. -- Catalin