From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5BAC433E2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9CA2083B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M6NhvpJk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F9CA2083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 340AB6B005C; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:02:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2ED826B005D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:02:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1B60E6B0062; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:02:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0240.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.240]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED68E6B005C for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:02:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8EE180AD82F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77271962922.07.hill74_4a0577c27121 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEB918065952 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:41 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: hill74_4a0577c27121 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2579 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A75620770; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600333360; bh=vlf0S0EauMC6nD6qyDnt+7B3P+ZVGEIqiRXpLUX5ZJc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M6NhvpJk8wo1YtQ0trFgtmzCXKnMDjuA0tqn1281gM1pc0OmMvnzdxNdQ1lMtTn35 p/gaw7Zfe9U570ujarHT6zn85MxoNYugerupzl5iW0lH993DeeF9y80Or4UwxFZoIl N6rsRRN1Zg9I+o/+GpBCzQvSne88iBKK3eOLPISc= Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:02:35 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Nick Desaulniers , song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, ardb@kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: arm64: mm: move dma_contiguous_reserve() to be after paging_init() Message-ID: <20200917090234.GB29556@willie-the-truck> References: <20200916085933.25220-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> <20200917001934.2793370-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8FEB918065952 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000039, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Mike, On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:27:18PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 9/16/20 5:19 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > It looks like that change referenced may also break arm32 boots with today's > > next? > > > > The following allows me to boot, but I have no idea if it's incorrect or not. > > Thanks Nick, > > The referenced commit was pulled from Andrew's tree and subsequent versions > of next. By "pulled" do you mean removed? (potential terminology clash with git pull is confusing me here!). > I'm looking into other architectures as this is dependent on where in arch > specific boot process first cma call is made. Hopefully, there is a some > way to do this without potentially touching a bunch of arch code. Ok, for now I won't queue this arm64 patch, then. Cheers, Will