From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@michaellarabel.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ted Ts'o <tytso@google.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Benchmarking
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:52:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915135246.GG5449@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915103938.GL4863@quack2.suse.cz>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi Matthew!
>
> On Tue 15-09-20 04:32:10, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 09:44:15AM -0500, Michael Larabel wrote:
> > > Interesting, I'll fire up some cross-filesystem benchmarks with those tests
> > > today and report back shortly with the difference.
> >
> > If you have time, perhaps you'd like to try this patch. It tries to
> > handle page faults locklessly when possible, which should be the case
> > where you're seeing page lock contention. I've tried to be fairly
> > conservative in this patch; reducing page lock acquisition should be
> > possible in more cases.
>
> So I'd be somewhat uneasy with this optimization. The thing is that e.g.
> page migration relies on page lock protecting page from being mapped? How
> does your patch handle that? I'm also not sure if the rmap code is really
> ready for new page reverse mapping being added without holding page lock...
I admit to not even having looked at the page migration code. This
patch was really to demonstrate that it's _possible_ to do page faults
without taking the page lock.
It's possible to expand the ClearPageUptodate page validity protocol
beyond mm/truncate.c, of course. We can find all necessary places to
change by grepping for 'page_mapped'. Some places (eg the invalidate2
path) can't safely ClearPageUptodate before their existing call to
unmap_mapping_pages(), and those places will have to add a second
test-and-call.
It seems to me the page_add_file_rmap() is fine with being called
without the page lock, unless the page is compound. So we could
make sure not to use this new protocol for THPs ...
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2604,7 +2604,7 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (fpin)
goto out_retry;
- if (likely(PageUptodate(page))) {
+ if (likely(PageUptodate(page) && !PageTransHuge(page))) {
ret |= VM_FAULT_UPTODATE;
goto uptodate;
}
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 53c8ef2bb38b..6981e8738df4 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3460,6 +3460,9 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
}
+ /* rmap needs THP pages to be locked in case it's mlocked */
+ VM_BUG_ON((ret & VM_FAULT_UPTODATE) && PageTransHuge(page));
+
return ret;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHk-=wjqE_a6bpZyDQ4DCrvj_Dv2RwQoY7wN91kj8y-tZFRvEA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <0cbc959e-1b8d-8d7e-1dc6-672cf5b3899a@MichaelLarabel.com>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=whP-7Uw9WgWgjRgF1mCg+NnkOPpWjVw+a9M3F9C52DrVg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wjfw3U5eTGWLaisPHg1+jXsCX=xLZgqPx4KJeHhEqRnEQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <a2369108-7103-278c-9f10-6309a0a9dc3b@MichaelLarabel.com>
[not found] ` <CAOQ4uxhz8prfD5K7dU68yHdz=iBndCXTg5w4BrF-35B+4ziOwA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <0daf6ae6-422c-dd46-f85a-e83f6e1d1113@MichaelLarabel.com>
[not found] ` <20200912143704.GB6583@casper.infradead.org>
[not found] ` <803672c0-7c57-9d25-ffb4-cde891eac4d3@MichaelLarabel.com>
[not found] ` <20200915033210.GA5449@casper.infradead.org>
2020-09-15 10:39 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-15 13:52 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200915135246.GG5449@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=Michael@michaellarabel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox