From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE7EC43461 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465B20771 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YvRCa0si" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9465B20771 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C408D6B0003; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:57:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BF0E56B0037; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:57:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B079C6B0055; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:57:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0039.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.39]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2F76B0003 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:57:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535BE1120F for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:57:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77259703878.24.bomb00_5e11c9027104 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B121A4A0 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:57:59 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: bomb00_5e11c9027104 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2086 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from X1 (unknown [209.33.215.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47517206D5; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:57:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600041477; bh=9BRfXp4UaiMcJn7vV1ZVU2hiciqJlN+Cm5JOOvSpTeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YvRCa0sihD7B9JkE47AYd0ysLyL4hly5aAQvqbJ1bkEAqlfy/e4fe5tvaMR3xvZRg 6M6kGtU3DeZxWAj5GqPVmSqsm0CSqf3x5AX09x/6UwPI3NPEAgXNh9BWY/GL0oPvGs 2pCuQQPS7aYgxh1WU8OCHxyNhoTaYX9EEGtHJy9A= Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:57:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Al Viro , bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, gaetan@nexylan.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [Bug 209245] New: 5.8.x Cannot allocate memory requesting sysctl Message-Id: <20200913165756.3a320de2a46d143f9eed5fc8@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200913063302.GA6620@lst.de> References: <20200912173854.8ec0189616e541691644c4d0@linux-foundation.org> <20200913063302.GA6620@lst.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 22B121A4A0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:33:02 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:38:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > > bugzilla web interface). > > This is probably fixed by the > > "[PATCH 0/6] Some buffer management fixes for proc" > > series from Josef. Something backportable to -stable might be needed?