From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDF8C433E7 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEE92087D for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="t9Y31Vy9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9FEE92087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1DBA66B0037; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:54:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 18CE96B005D; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:54:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0A1FA6B0062; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:54:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0033.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.33]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D716B0037 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:54:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBF63629 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:32 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77213579184.22.van53_3208f7127096 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F91918038E67 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:32 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: van53_3208f7127096 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2359 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.70.91.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAA4E2087D; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:54:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598943271; bh=NVmhxz3quM6Qr+ee/JkOEjpslKF1E6DzA+56ugDqG9k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=t9Y31Vy9OQ4upleKjlqFdKlJK15KKX0SeJMrIzpOD+h6YlgofD7l0DMfSRLJ3VJky nrx3MQjQHGExn3IlWT0UpeVebNfTu7czSbvy817AI5ED9IboS07XLdgA4yy7spNWwP DDlnAwt6zWXRDvjtlRUnCMDswWZXlDSzXZawiaLk= Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:54:25 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] Use asm-generic for mmu_context no-op functions Message-ID: <20200901065425.GE432455@kernel.org> References: <20200826145249.745432-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200830101837.GB423750@kernel.org> <1598940942.o1fbygdcvl.astroid@bobo.none> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1598940942.o1fbygdcvl.astroid@bobo.none> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7F91918038E67 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:17:00PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Excerpts from Mike Rapoport's message of August 30, 2020 8:18 pm: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > >> It would be nice to be able to modify mmu_context functions or add a > >> hook without updating all architectures, many of which will be no-ops. > >> > >> The motivation for this series is a change to lazy mmu handling, but > >> this series stands on its own as a good cleanup whether or not we end > >> up making that change. > > > > I really like this series, I just have some small comments in reply to > > patch 1, otherwise feel free to add > > > > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport > > I can't see your comments in reply to patch 1. Hmm, apparently I forgot to hit "Send"... > Thanks, > Nick > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.