From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB46C433DF for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D87C207F7 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D87C207F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 319526B0008; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2C96E6B000A; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:54:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1E18B6B000D; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:54:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0245.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.245]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1AC6B0008 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B469111220 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77195888910.01.foot23_36056072706c Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88597100473D8 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: foot23_36056072706c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5133 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gaia (unknown [46.69.195.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD3A0207CD; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:54:29 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Vincenzo Frascino , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Evgenii Stepanov , Elena Petrova , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/35] arm64: mte: Add in-kernel tag fault handler Message-ID: <20200827095429.GC29264@gaia> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 88597100473D8 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:27:03PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > index 5e832b3387f1..c62c8ba85c0e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -222,6 +223,20 @@ int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > return 1; > } > > +static bool is_el1_mte_sync_tag_check_fault(unsigned int esr) > +{ > + unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); > + unsigned int fsc = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC; > + > + if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR) > + return false; > + > + if (fsc == ESR_ELx_FSC_MTE) > + return true; > + > + return false; > +} > + > static bool is_el1_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr) > { > return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR; > @@ -294,6 +309,18 @@ static void die_kernel_fault(const char *msg, unsigned long addr, > do_exit(SIGKILL); > } > > +static void report_tag_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > + struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + bool is_write = ((esr & ESR_ELx_WNR) >> ESR_ELx_WNR_SHIFT) != 0; > + > + pr_alert("Memory Tagging Extension Fault in %pS\n", (void *)regs->pc); > + pr_alert(" %s at address %lx\n", is_write ? "Write" : "Read", addr); > + pr_alert(" Pointer tag: [%02x], memory tag: [%02x]\n", > + mte_get_ptr_tag(addr), > + mte_get_mem_tag((void *)addr)); > +} > + > static void __do_kernel_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > @@ -317,12 +344,16 @@ static void __do_kernel_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > msg = "execute from non-executable memory"; > else > msg = "read from unreadable memory"; > + } else if (is_el1_mte_sync_tag_check_fault(esr)) { > + report_tag_fault(addr, esr, regs); > + msg = "memory tagging extension fault"; IIUC, that's dead code. See my comment below on do_tag_check_fault(). > } else if (addr < PAGE_SIZE) { > msg = "NULL pointer dereference"; > } else { > msg = "paging request"; > } > > + Unnecessary empty line. > die_kernel_fault(msg, addr, esr, regs); > } > > @@ -658,10 +689,27 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) > return 0; > } > > +static int do_tag_recovery(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > + struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + report_tag_fault(addr, esr, regs); > + > + /* Skip over the faulting instruction and continue: */ > + arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE); Ooooh, do we expect the kernel to still behave correctly after this? I thought the recovery means disabling tag checking altogether and restarting the instruction rather than skipping over it. We only skip if we emulated it. > + > + return 0; > +} > + > + > static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); > + /* The tag check fault (TCF) is per TTBR */ > + if (is_ttbr0_addr(addr)) > + do_bad_area(addr, esr, regs); > + else > + do_tag_recovery(addr, esr, regs); So we never invoke __do_kernel_fault() for a synchronous tag check in the kernel. What's with all the is_el1_mte_sync_tag_check_fault() check above? -- Catalin