From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/28] arm64: mte: CPU feature detection and initial sysreg configuration
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:24:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826152411.GA24545@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825105450.GA22233@C02TF0J2HF1T.local>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:53:16AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 2020-08-24 19:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> > > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> > > index 8a1cbfd544d6..6c3b2fc922bb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> > > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
> > > HCR_AMO | HCR_SWIO | HCR_TIDCP | HCR_RW | HCR_TLOR | \
> > > HCR_FMO | HCR_IMO)
> > > #define HCR_VIRT_EXCP_MASK (HCR_VSE | HCR_VI | HCR_VF)
> > > -#define HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_API | HCR_APK)
> > > +#define HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_API | HCR_APK | HCR_ATA)
> > > #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H)
> >
> > Why is HCR_ATA only set for nVHE? HCR_EL2.ATA seems to apply to both,
> > doesn't it?
>
> We need HCR_EL2.ATA to be set when !VHE so that the host kernel can use
> MTE. That said, I think we need to turn it off when running a guest.
> Even if we hide the ID register, the guest may still attempt to enable
> tags on some memory that doesn't support it, leading to unpredictable
> behaviour (well, only if we expose device memory to guests directly;
> Steve's patches will deal with this but for now we just disable MTE in
> guests).
So if we want to properly disable MTE for guests when !VHE (not just the
ID reg), I came up with the diff below. However, given that Steven is
already working on KVM support, I wonder whether we could just make MTE
depend on !VHE temporarily, remove it once we get the full MTE KVM
support. It's up to you (either way, I still need to solve the undef
injection since that affects both VHE and !VHE; patch to follow).
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
index 69eae608d670..51204ac30154 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
@@ -32,10 +32,23 @@ static void __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
}
__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
+
+ /* MTE is not supported in guests yet, disable access to tags */
+ if (system_supports_mte()) {
+ u64 val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
+ val &= ~HCR_ATA;
+ write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
+ }
}
static void __tlb_switch_to_host(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
{
+ /* Re-enable MTE for the host kernel */
+ if (system_supports_mte()) {
+ u64 val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
+ write_sysreg(val | HCR_ATA, hcr_el2);
+ }
+
write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 18:27 [PATCH v8 00/28] arm64: Memory Tagging Extension user-space support Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/28] arm64: mte: system register definitions Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/28] arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/28] arm64: mte: CPU feature detection and initial sysreg configuration Catalin Marinas
2020-08-25 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-08-25 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-25 13:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-08-26 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-04 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-08-26 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/28] arm64: mte: Add specific SIGSEGV codes Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/28] arm64: mte: Handle synchronous and asynchronous tag check faults Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/28] mm: Add PG_arch_2 page flag Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/28] mm: Preserve the PG_arch_2 flag in __split_huge_page_tail() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/28] arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/28] arm64: mte: Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/28] arm64: Avoid unnecessary clear_user_page() indirection Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 11/28] arm64: mte: Tags-aware aware memcmp_pages() implementation Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 12/28] mm: Introduce arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 13/28] arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 14/28] mm: Introduce arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 15/28] arm64: mte: Validate the PROT_MTE request via arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 16/28] mm: Allow arm64 mmap(PROT_MTE) on RAM-based files Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 17/28] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the tag check mode via prctl() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 18/28] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the generated random tags " Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 19/28] arm64: mte: Restore the GCR_EL1 register after a suspend Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 20/28] arm64: mte: Allow {set,get}_tagged_addr_ctrl() on non-current tasks Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 21/28] arm64: mte: ptrace: Add PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}MTETAGS support Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 22/28] arm64: mte: ptrace: Add NT_ARM_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL regset Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 23/28] fs: Handle intra-page faults in copy_mount_options() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 24/28] mm: Add arch hooks for saving/restoring tags Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 25/28] arm64: mte: Enable swap of tagged pages Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 26/28] arm64: mte: Save tags when hibernating Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 27/28] arm64: mte: Kconfig entry Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-25 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 28/28] arm64: mte: Add Memory Tagging Extension documentation Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200826152411.GA24545@gaia \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox