From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB1EC433E1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4015720786 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4015720786 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CEF916B000A; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:24:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C77C56B000C; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:24:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B1BD78D0001; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:24:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0031.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.31]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CB06B000A for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:24:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1D2465 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77189461776.05.alley54_2b0e2ed2705c Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D1818000BF7 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:06 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: alley54_2b0e2ed2705c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3752 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8787ACBA; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0D531E1316; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:24:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:24:03 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , William Kucharski , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: Pass pvec directly to find_get_entries Message-ID: <20200825152403.GE32298@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20200819150555.31669-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200819150555.31669-7-willy@infradead.org> <20200824161620.GK24877@quack2.suse.cz> <20200824173639.GD17456@casper.infradead.org> <20200825123324.GB32298@quack2.suse.cz> <20200825132814.GO17456@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200825132814.GO17456@casper.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 09D1818000BF7 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue 25-08-20 14:28:14, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:33:24PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Mon 24-08-20 18:36:39, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > We already have functions in filemap which take a pagevec, eg > > > page_cache_delete_batch() and delete_from_page_cache_batch(). > > > > Right but those are really pretty internal helper functions so I don't > > think they form or strong precedence. > > To be honest, I saw that as being the way forward for the page cache APIs. > If we're going to use a batching mechanism, it should be pagevecs, and > it should be built into the page cache interfaces rather than hanging > out off on the side. > > > > So if we're going to merge the two functions, it seems more natural to > > > have it in filemap.c and called find_get_entries(), but I'm definitely > > > open to persuasion on this! > > > > I agree that having non-trivial xarray code in mm/swap.c isn't attractive > > either. Dunno, I dislike the inconsistency between find_get_pages() and > > find_get_entries() you create but they aren't completely consistent anyway > > so I can live with that. Or we can just leave the pagevec_lookup_entries() > > wrapper and the API will stay consistent... > > I was thinking about this some more [1] [2]. I think we can get to the > point where find_get_pages(), find_get_entries() and find_get_pages_tag() > (and all their variants) end up taking a pagevec as their last argument. > > Also, I was thinking that all these names are wrong. Really, they're > mapping_get_pages(), mapping_get_entries() and mapping_get_marked_pages(). > So maybe I should move in that direction. Well, as I wrote to you in one of the replies. IMO pagevec unnecessarily complicate matters and we should rather have for_each_mapping_page() and for_each_mapping_entry() magic macros that hide pagevecs inside. Most of users process returned pages/entries one by one so these macros would simplify them. So it would seem better to me to go more into this direction than to spread pagevecs... > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824214841.17132-1-willy@infradead.org/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824183424.4222-1-willy@infradead.org/ Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR