Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] genirq: Shutdown irq chips in suspend/resume during hibernation

[Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>]

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:36:37AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21 2020 at 22:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Add a new quirk flag IRQCHIP_SHUTDOWN_ON_SUSPEND and add support for
> > it the core interrupt suspend/resume paths.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v1->v2: Corrected the author's name to tglx@
> 
> Can you please move that Changelog part below the --- seperator next
> time because that's really not part of the final commit messaage and the
> maintainer has then to strip it off manually
> 
Ack.
> > Signed-off-by: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> These SOB lines are just wrongly ordered as they suggest:
> 
>      Anchal has authored the patch and Thomas transported it
> 
> which is clearly not the case. So the right order is:
> 
I must admit I wasn't aware of that. Will fix.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
> 
> And that needs another tweak at the top of the change log. The first
> line in the mail body wants to be:
> 
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Yes I accidentally missed that in this patch.
Others have that line on all the patches and even v2 for this patch
has. Will fix.
> 
> followed by an empty new line before the actual changelog text
> starts. That way the attribution of the patch when applying it will be
> correct.
> 
> Documentation/process/ is there for a reason and following the few
> simple rules to get that straight is not rocket science.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> 
> 
Anchal