From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxarm@huawei.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:24:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820222433.GA1571517@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819145111.1715026-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:51:07PM +0800, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> In common with memoryless domains we only register GI domains
> if the proximity node is not online. If a domain is already
> a memory containing domain, or a memoryless domain there is
> nothing to do just because it also contains a Generic Initiator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
> index bbfde3d2662f..f631467272a3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
> @@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ extern void numa_clear_node(int cpu);
> extern void __init init_cpu_to_node(void);
> extern void numa_add_cpu(int cpu);
> extern void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu);
> +extern void init_gi_nodes(void);
> #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> static inline void numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) { }
> static inline void numa_clear_node(int cpu) { }
> static inline void init_cpu_to_node(void) { }
> static inline void numa_add_cpu(int cpu) { }
> static inline void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu) { }
> +static inline void init_gi_nodes(void) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 3511736fbc74..9062c146f03a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1218,6 +1218,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> prefill_possible_map();
>
> init_cpu_to_node();
> + init_gi_nodes();
>
> io_apic_init_mappings();
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index aa76ec2d359b..fc630dc6764e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -747,6 +747,20 @@ static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid)
> */
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Generic Initiator Nodes may have neither CPU nor Memory.
> + * At this stage if either of the others were present we would
> + * already be online.
> + */
> +void __init init_gi_nodes(void)
> +{
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_GENERIC_INITIATOR)
> + if (!node_online(nid))
> + init_memory_less_node(nid);
> +}
This doesn't *look* very x86-specific, and apparently you don't need
any arm64-specific changes? Too bad this can't be unified a little
bit to remove the arch #ifdefs completely.
I do see that init_memory_less_node() is only implemented on x86, but
it just seems like all this might not be inherently be arch-specific.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-19 14:51 [PATCH v9 0/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator " Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-20 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-08-21 8:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-20 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-21 8:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-21 12:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-21 12:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-21 13:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-21 14:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-21 16:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-21 16:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-21 16:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] node: Add access1 class to represent CPU to memory characteristics Jonathan Cameron
2020-08-19 14:51 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1 Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820222433.GA1571517@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox