From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E232DC433DF for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAFA20786 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:45:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8DAFA20786 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0F0EA6B0095; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 07B4E6B0096; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E84788D0003; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:45:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0062.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.62]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1106B0095 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:45:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D4A2478 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:45:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77169708756.05.earth80_0e076742702d Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DA2180295AA for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:45:38 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: earth80_0e076742702d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3427 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CA1C068C4E; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:45:33 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Robin Murphy , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Marek Szyprowski , linux-samsung-soc , Joonyoung Shim , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Ben Skeggs , Matt Porter , Linux Media Mailing List , Tom Lendacky , Pawel Osciak , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Joerg Roedel , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Seung-Woo Kim , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT Message-ID: <20200820044533.GA4570@lst.de> References: <20200819065555.1802761-1-hch@lst.de> <20200819065555.1802761-6-hch@lst.de> <62e4f4fc-c8a5-3ee8-c576-fe7178cb4356@arm.com> <20200819135738.GB17098@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 57DA2180295AA X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > By the way, as a videobuf2 reviewer, I'd appreciate being CC'd on any > > > series related to the subsystem-facing DMA API changes, since > > > videobuf2 is one of the biggest users of it. > > > > The cc list is too long - I cc lists and key maintainers. As a reviewer > > should should watch your subsystems lists closely. > > Well, I guess we can disagree on this, because there is no clear > policy. I'm listed in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem and I > believe the purpose of the file is to list the people to CC on > relevant patches. We're all overloaded with work and having to look > through the huge volume of mailing lists like linux-media doesn't help > and thus I'd still appreciate being added on CC. I'm happy to Cc and active participant in the discussion. I'm not going to add all reviewers because even with the trimmed CC list I'm already hitting the number of receipients limit on various lists.