From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285B1C433E3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CB02076E for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="hotJtzwJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E2CB02076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A5D476B000C; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A0E796B0010; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8B6066B0023; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0215.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.215]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773396B000C for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F429824556B for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:23 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77162972166.07.color23_24171c12701d Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E7A1803F9A9 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:22 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: color23_24171c12701d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6990 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf44.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07I81seQ019531; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=G6FdMnRnBbJelDSmHpHS6pNSWA5jStVlCMtnhbO1yCU=; b=hotJtzwJUNdKJgUngmdNbYveuIgxvnGpvpPLyNyblJhXT8Mug9vvssT1MIsJAge81+9/ Xdo7GkMrVfz78CQpbMrKF9A9zV61YcfYlcEoGtqHhAJAgNFyZEngr0NxlJxe1+vowYzI moeyFsIkE9f41TEm1//xGoysdijEcLcCY7oibhR6e47r5Nyp9WilbRZMyLSIgWZx08HU DHgS/zG2ydC87pac3x+BtAI79EluMXPJkCAFuj9aVgmcff6fGLMlKHo0qRh62EraRZXO nVtLECNgI8n7PcFWbHMwI+6x4lOO9GjHVhKXnlbK++A+wraXW9CA0VD5m7qSFjc5W6P3 dA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3304tds9p4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:18 -0400 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 07I833EQ023892; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:17 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3304tds9mn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:12:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07I8Bk2N010553; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:15 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3304tr87aw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:15 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 07I8CCaT25166112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:13 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EB2A4053; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32CBA4051; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srikart450.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.93.83]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:12:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev , Srikar Dronamraju , linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Christopher Lameter , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Gautham R Shenoy , Satheesh Rajendran , David Hildenbrand , Aneesh Kumar K V Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:41:02 +0530 Message-Id: <20200818081104.57888-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200818081104.57888-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200818081104.57888-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-18_04:2020-08-18,2020-08-18 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008180051 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 04E7A1803F9A9 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: A Powerpc system with multiple possible nodes and with CONFIG_NUMA enabled always used to have a node 0, even if node 0 does not any cpus or memory attached to it. As per PAPR, node affinity of a cpu is only available once its present / online. For all cpus that are possible but not present, cpu_to_node() would point to node 0. To ensure a cpuless, memoryless dummy node is not online, powerpc need to make sure all possible but not present cpu_to_node are set to a proper node. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Christopher Lameter Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Gautham R Shenoy Cc: Satheesh Rajendran Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Aneesh Kumar K V Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju --- Changelog v3:->v4: - Resolved comments from Christopher. Link v3: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200501031128.19584-1-srikar@linux.= vnet.ibm.com/t/#u arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index 1f61fa2148b5..72f6cca1332c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -507,6 +507,11 @@ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu) int fcpu =3D cpu_first_thread_sibling(lcpu); int nid =3D NUMA_NO_NODE; =20 + if (!cpu_present(lcpu)) { + set_cpu_numa_node(lcpu, first_online_node); + return first_online_node; + } + /* * If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, use it * directly instead of querying the firmware, since it represents @@ -935,8 +940,17 @@ void __init mem_topology_setup(void) =20 reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table(); =20 - for_each_present_cpu(cpu) + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + /* + * Powerpc with CONFIG_NUMA always used to have a node 0, + * even if it was memoryless or cpuless. For all cpus that + * are possible but not present, cpu_to_node() would point + * to node 0. To remove a cpuless, memoryless dummy node, + * powerpc need to make sure all possible but not present + * cpu_to_node are set to a proper node. + */ numa_setup_cpu(cpu); + } } =20 void __init initmem_init(void) --=20 2.18.1