From: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Support high-order page bulk allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:16:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818021628.GB171937@KEI> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200814205558.GA2814941@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2511 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:55:58PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 06:40:20PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:31:24AM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > There is a need for special HW to require bulk allocation of
> > > high-order pages. For example, 4800 * order-4 pages.
> >
> > ... but you haven't shown that user.
>
> Kyoungho is working on it.
> I am not sure how much he could share but hopefully, he could
> show some. Kyoungho?
We are preparing the following patch to dma-buf heap that uses
alloc_pages_bulk(). The heap collects pages of identical size from
alloc_pages_bulk() for the H/Ws that have restrictions in memory
alignments due to the performance or the functionality.
> >
> > > int alloc_pages_bulk(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > > unsigned int migratetype, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > unsigned int order, unsigned int nr_elem,
> > > struct page **pages);
> > >
> > > It will investigate the [start, end) and migrate movable pages
> > > out there by best effort(by upcoming patches) to make requested
> > > order's free pages.
> > >
> > > The allocated pages will be returned using pages parameter.
> > > Return value represents how many of requested order pages we got.
> > > It could be less than user requested by nr_elem.
> >
> > I don't understand why a user would need to know the PFNs to allocate
> > between. This seems like something that's usually specified by GFP_DMA32
> > or similar.
>
> I wanted to let the API wok from CMA area and/or movable zone where are
> always fulled with migrable pages.
> If we carry on only zone flags without pfn range, it couldn't fulfil cma
> area cases.
> Other reason is if user see fewer pages returned, he could try subsequent
> ranges to get remained ones.
>
> > Is it useful to return fewer pages than requested?
>
> It's useful because user could ask further than what they need or retry.
I agree with Minchan. A CMA area is private to a device or a device
driver except the shared DMA pool. Drivers first try collecting large
order pages from its private CMA area. If the number of pages returned
by alloc_pages_bulk() is less than nr_elem, then the driver can retry
with fewer nr_elem after a while with expecting pinned pages or pages
under races in the CMA area are resolved.
The driver may further try call alloc_pages_bulk() on another CMA area
which is available to the driver or the movable zone.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 17:31 Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 1/7] mm: page_owner: split page by order Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 2/7] mm: introduce split_page_by_order Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 3/7] mm: compaction: deal with upcoming high-order page splitting Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 4/7] mm: factor __alloc_contig_range out Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 5/7] mm: introduce alloc_pages_bulk API Minchan Kim
2020-08-17 17:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 6/7] mm: make alloc_pages_bulk best effort Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:31 ` [RFC 7/7] mm/page_isolation: avoid drain_all_pages for alloc_pages_bulk Minchan Kim
2020-08-14 17:40 ` [RFC 0/7] Support high-order page bulk allocation Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-14 20:55 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-18 2:16 ` Cho KyongHo [this message]
2020-08-18 9:22 ` Cho KyongHo
2020-08-16 12:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-17 15:27 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-17 15:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-17 16:30 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-17 16:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-17 17:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-17 23:34 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-18 7:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-18 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-18 15:15 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-18 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-18 16:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-18 16:49 ` Minchan Kim
2020-08-19 0:27 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200818021628.GB171937@KEI \
--to=pullip.cho@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox