linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	"Resch Carsten \(CM/ESO6\)" <Carsten.Resch@de.bosch.com>,
	"Rosca, Eugeniu \(ADITG/ESB\)" <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Long Workqueue delays.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:25:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817152507.GC112820@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71aafe68-7fe0-6b77-ea8e-83edd3f16c8d@mentor.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:40:03PM +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
> We have issues with the workqueue of the kernel overloading the CPU 0 
> when we we disconnect a USB stick.

Do you unmount the stick before disconnecting it?

> This results in other items on the shared workqueue being delayed by
> around 6.5 seconds with a default kernel configuration and 2.3 seconds
> on a config tailored for our RCar embedded platform.
> 
> I am aware there will be delays on the shared workqueue, are the delays
> we are seeing considered normal?

Assuming the workqueue delay is caused by the USB subsystem, you may be 
able to get more information by turning on USB dynamic debugging:

	echo 'module usbcore =p' >/sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control

and seeing what shows up in the dmesg log.

One long-running job should not normally be enough to delay an entire 
workqueues.  Workqueues are allowed to spawn multiple threads; they are 
supposed to resize themselves dynamically as required.

Alan Stern


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-17 11:40 Jim Baxter
2020-08-17 11:57 ` Greg KH
2020-08-17 18:24   ` Jim Baxter
2020-08-17 18:47     ` Alan Stern
2020-08-18 10:54       ` Jim Baxter
2020-08-18 14:48         ` Alan Stern
2020-08-17 15:25 ` Alan Stern [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200817152507.GC112820@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=Carsten.Resch@de.bosch.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=jim_baxter@mentor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox