From: nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, osalvador@suse.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
david@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
zeil@yandex-team.ru, cai@lca.pw, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/12] mm,hwpoison: Return 0 if the page is already poisoned in soft-offline
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:49:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806184923.7007-11-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806184923.7007-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Currently, there is an inconsistency when calling soft-offline from
different paths on a page that is already poisoned.
1) madvise:
madvise_inject_error skips any poisoned page and continues
the loop.
If that was the only page to madvise, it returns 0.
2) /sys/devices/system/memory/:
When calling soft_offline_page_store()->soft_offline_page(),
we return -EBUSY in case the page is already poisoned.
This is inconsistent with a) the above example and b)
memory_failure, where we return 0 if the page was poisoned.
Fix this by dropping the PageHWPoison() check in madvise_inject_error,
and let soft_offline_page return 0 if it finds the page already poisoned.
Please, note that this represents a user-api change, since now the
return error when calling soft_offline_page_store()->soft_offline_page()
will be different.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
---
mm/madvise.c | 5 -----
mm/memory-failure.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18/mm/madvise.c v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18_patched/mm/madvise.c
index a16dba21cdf6..5fa5f66468b3 100644
--- v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18/mm/madvise.c
+++ v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18_patched/mm/madvise.c
@@ -910,11 +910,6 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
*/
size = page_size(compound_head(page));
- if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
- put_page(page);
- continue;
- }
-
if (behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) {
pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
pfn, start);
diff --git v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18/mm/memory-failure.c v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
index 3a2cd094b77f..61e20b7dd81c 100644
--- v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ v5.8-rc7-mmotm-2020-07-27-18-18_patched/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1800,7 +1800,7 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
unlock_page(page);
put_page(page);
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
- return -EBUSY;
+ return 0;
}
if (!PageHuge(page))
@@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@ int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
put_page(page);
- return -EBUSY;
+ return 0;
}
get_online_mems();
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-06 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-06 18:49 [PATCH v6 00/12] HWPOISON: soft offline rework nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] mm,hwpoison: cleanup unused PageHuge() check nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] mm, hwpoison: remove recalculating hpage nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] mm,hwpoison-inject: don't pin for hwpoison_filter nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] mm,hwpoison: Un-export get_hwpoison_page and make it static nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] mm,hwpoison: Kill put_hwpoison_page nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] mm,hwpoison: Unify THP handling for hard and soft offline nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] mm,hwpoison: Rework soft offline for free pages nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] mm,hwpoison: Rework soft offline for in-use pages nao.horiguchi
2020-09-18 7:58 ` osalvador
2020-09-19 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2020-09-19 8:26 ` osalvador
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] mm,hwpoison: Refactor soft_offline_huge_page and __soft_offline_page nao.horiguchi
2020-08-06 18:49 ` nao.horiguchi [this message]
2020-08-06 18:49 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] mm,hwpoison: introduce MF_MSG_UNSPLIT_THP nao.horiguchi
[not found] ` <20200810152254.GC5307@lca.pw>
2020-08-11 3:11 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] HWPOISON: soft offline rework HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
[not found] ` <6214D3DD-7EB1-4598-8DA2-344430EC7858@lca.pw>
2020-08-11 3:56 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
[not found] ` <20200811173923.GA39857@lca.pw>
2020-08-11 19:32 ` Naoya Horiguchi
[not found] ` <20200806184923.7007-13-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
2020-08-24 12:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] mm,hwpoison: double-check page count in __get_any_page() Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200806184923.7007-11-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--to=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=zeil@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox