* [PATCH] mm: Warn mmput() from memory reclaim context.
@ 2020-07-16 15:30 Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-16 19:45 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2020-07-16 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, Tetsuo Handa
syzbot is reporting that mmput() from shrinker function has a risk of
deadlock [1], for delayed_uprobe_add() from update_ref_ctr() calls
kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) with delayed_uprobe_lock held, and
uprobe_clear_state() from __mmput() also holds delayed_uprobe_lock.
However, it took 18 months to hit this race for the third time, for
mmput() invokes __mmput() only when ->mm_users dropped to 0. If we
always warn like might_sleep(), we can detect the possibility of
deadlock more easier.
For now, I inlined the check under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. If we find
more locations, we could introduce a macro like might_sleep().
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bc9e7303f537c41b2b0cc2dfcea3fc42964c2d45
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
kernel/fork.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index efc5493203ae..8717ce50ff0d 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1109,6 +1109,10 @@ static inline void __mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
void mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
might_sleep();
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+ /* Calling mmput() from shrinker context can deadlock. */
+ WARN_ON(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC);
+#endif
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_users))
__mmput(mm);
--
2.18.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: Warn mmput() from memory reclaim context.
2020-07-16 15:30 [PATCH] mm: Warn mmput() from memory reclaim context Tetsuo Handa
@ 2020-07-16 19:45 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 22:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2020-07-16 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-mm
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting that mmput() from shrinker function has a risk of
> deadlock [1], for delayed_uprobe_add() from update_ref_ctr() calls
> kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) with delayed_uprobe_lock held, and
> uprobe_clear_state() from __mmput() also holds delayed_uprobe_lock.
>
> However, it took 18 months to hit this race for the third time, for
> mmput() invokes __mmput() only when ->mm_users dropped to 0. If we
> always warn like might_sleep(), we can detect the possibility of
> deadlock more easier.
>
> For now, I inlined the check under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. If we find
> more locations, we could introduce a macro like might_sleep().
>
Hi Tetsuo,
It looks like this is one issue where mmput() interacted poorly while in
direct reclaim because of a uprobes issue, I'm not sure that we can make a
generalization that mmput() is *always* problematic when PF_MEMALLOC is
set. I'm also mindful of the (ab)use of PF_MEMALLOC outside just the
direct reclaim path. Or maybe there is a way you can show that mmput()
while PF_MEMALLOC is set is always concerning?
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bc9e7303f537c41b2b0cc2dfcea3fc42964c2d45
>
I wasn't familiar with this particular report, but it seems like the fix
is simply to do the kzalloc() before taking delayed_uprobe_lock and
freeing it if delayed_uprobe_check() already finds one for that uprobe?
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index efc5493203ae..8717ce50ff0d 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1109,6 +1109,10 @@ static inline void __mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
> void mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> might_sleep();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> + /* Calling mmput() from shrinker context can deadlock. */
> + WARN_ON(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC);
> +#endif
>
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_users))
> __mmput(mm);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-16 22:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-16 15:30 [PATCH] mm: Warn mmput() from memory reclaim context Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-16 19:45 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-16 22:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox