From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: address fault time regression
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:26:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706202615.32111-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622005551.GK5535@shao2-debian>
Commits c0d0381ade79 and 87bf91d39bb5 changed the way huegtlb locking
was performed to address BUGs. One specific change was to always take
the i_mmap_rwsem in read mode during fault processing. One result of
this change was a 33% regression for anon non-shared page faults [1].
Technically, i_mmap_rwsem only needs to be taken during page faults
if the pmd can potentially be shared. pmd sharing is not possible for
anon non-shared mappings (as in the reported regression), therefore the
code can be modified to not acquire the semaphore in this case.
Unfortunately, commit 87bf91d39bb5 depends on i_mmap_rwsem always being
taken in the fault path to prevent fault/truncation races. So, that
approach is no longer appropriate. Rather, the code now detects races
and backs out operations.
This code "works" in that it only takes i_mmap_rwsem when necessary and
addresses the original BUGs. However, I am sending as an RFC because:
- I am unsure if the added complexity is worth performance benefit.
- There needs to be a better way/location to make a decison about taking
the semaphore. See FIXME's in the code.
Comments and suggestions would be appreciated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200622005551.GK5535@shao2-debian
Mike Kravetz (3):
Revert: "hugetlbfs: Use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate
race"
hugetlbfs: Only take i_mmap_rwsem when sharing is possible
huegtlbfs: handle page fault/truncate races
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 69 +++++++++-----------
mm/hugetlb.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
--
2.25.4
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-06 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200622005551.GK5535@shao2-debian>
2020-07-06 20:26 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2020-07-06 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Revert: "hugetlbfs: Use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate race" Mike Kravetz
2020-07-06 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] hugetlbfs: Only take i_mmap_rwsem when sharing is possible Mike Kravetz
2020-07-21 0:56 ` [hugetlbfs] 878308e2e0: vm-scalability.throughput 1.2% improvement kernel test robot
2020-07-06 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] huegtlbfs: handle page fault/truncate races Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200706202615.32111-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox