linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, dwagner@suse.de, tobin@kernel.org,
	cl@linux.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, cai@lca.pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [v2] Repair and clean up vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl ABI
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:00:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701160046.kvhsq43adcw46fbq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701152621.D520E62B@viggo.jf.intel.com>

On 20-07-01 08:26:21, Dave Hansen wrote:
> A previous cleanup accidentally changed the vm.zone_reclaim_mode ABI.
> 
> This series restores the ABI and then reorganizes the code to make
> the ABI more obvious.  Since the single-patch v1[1], I've:
> 
>  * Restored the RECLAIM_ZONE naming, comment and Documentation now
>    that the implicit checks for it are known.
>  * Move RECLAIM_* definitions to a uapi header
>  * Add a node_reclaim_enabled() helper
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst |   10 +++++-----
>  include/linux/swap.h                    |    7 +++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h          |    7 +++++++
>  mm/khugepaged.c                         |    2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c                         |    2 +-
>  mm/vmscan.c                             |    3 ---
>  6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200626003459.D8E015CA@viggo.jf.intel.com/
> 
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>

Series is:
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

I was more thorough this time in checking all uses of node_reclaim_mode :-). I
do think in patch 2/3, using an enum would be a little better, which I've
mentioned there.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01 15:26 Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/vmscan: restore zone_reclaim_mode ABI Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 20:03   ` David Rientjes
2020-07-02 11:28   ` Huang, Ying
2020-07-02 14:36     ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/vmscan: move RECLAIM* bits to uapi header Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 15:46   ` Ben Widawsky
2020-07-01 15:56     ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 20:03   ` David Rientjes
2020-07-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/vmscan: replace implicit RECLAIM_ZONE checks with explicit checks Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 20:03   ` David Rientjes
2020-07-01 20:04     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-07-01 21:29       ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-01 22:01         ` David Rientjes
2020-07-01 16:00 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701160046.kvhsq43adcw46fbq@intel.com \
    --to=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tobin@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox