From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, bhe@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/spase: never partially remove memmap for early section
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:13:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624061340.GA11552@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623151828.GA31426@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:18:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Tue 23-06-20 17:42:58, Wei Yang wrote:
>> For early sections, we assumes its memmap will never be partially
>> removed. But current behavior breaks this.
>>
>> Let's correct it.
>>
>> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
>
>Can a user trigger this or is this a theoretical bug?
Let me rewrite the changelog a little. Look forward any comments.
For early sections, its memmap is handled specially even sub-section is
enabled. The memmap could only be populated as a whole.
Quoted from the comment of section_activate():
* The early init code does not consider partially populated
* initial sections, it simply assumes that memory will never be
* referenced. If we hot-add memory into such a section then we
* do not need to populate the memmap and can simply reuse what
* is already there.
While current section_deactivate() breaks this rule. When hot-remove a
sub-section, section_deactivate() would depopulate its memmap. The
consequence is if we hot-add this subsection again, its memmap never get
proper populated.
>
>> ---
>> mm/sparse.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index b2b9a3e34696..1a0069f492f5 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -825,10 +825,10 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
>> }
>>
>> - if (section_is_early && memmap)
>> - free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>> - else
>> + if (!section_is_early)
>
>This begs a comment.
>
>> depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>> + else if (memmap)
>> + free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>>
>> if (empty)
>> ms->section_mem_map = (unsigned long)NULL;
>> --
>> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 9:42 Wei Yang
2020-06-23 12:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-23 13:02 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-23 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-23 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2020-06-23 21:48 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 6:13 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-06-24 16:10 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24 22:05 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 22:20 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24 22:44 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 23:47 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-25 5:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-25 19:46 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-25 22:29 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-29 8:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-29 22:13 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-29 22:58 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-30 7:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-25 22:39 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-26 4:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 7:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 8:13 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 8:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 8:50 ` Michal Hocko
2020-06-24 22:27 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 0:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24 1:11 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 1:47 ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24 3:46 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 3:52 ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24 3:56 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 22:08 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624061340.GA11552@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local \
--to=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox