From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:31:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622193146.2985288-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
v4:
- rebase to v5.8-rc2
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200406231606.37619-1-keescook@chromium.org/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200324203231.64324-1-keescook@chromium.org/
rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/20190329081358.30497-1-elena.reshetova@intel.com/
Hi,
This is a continuation and refactoring of Elena's earlier effort to add
kernel stack base offset randomization. In the time since the previous
discussions, two attacks[1][2] were made public that depended on stack
determinism, so we're no longer in the position of "this is a good idea
but we have no examples of attacks". :)
Earlier discussions also devolved into debates on entropy sources, which
is mostly a red herring, given the already low entropy available due
to stack size. Regardless, entropy can be changed/improved separately
from this series as needed.
Earlier discussions also got stuck debating how much syscall overhead
was too much, but this is also a red herring since the feature itself
needs to be selectable at boot with no cost for those that don't want it:
this is solved here with static branches.
So, here is an improved version, made as arch-agnostic as possible,
with usage added for x86 and arm64. It also includes some small static
branch clean ups, and addresses some surprise performance issues due to
the stack canary[3].
Note that for v5.8, this depends on this fix (due to how x86 changed its
stack protector removal for syscall entry):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202006221201.3641ED037E@keescook/
Thanks!
-Kees
[1] https://a13xp0p0v.github.io/2020/02/15/CVE-2019-18683.html
[2] https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/125357/2/374717.pdf
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202003281520.A9BFF461@keescook/
Kees Cook (5):
jump_label: Provide CONFIG-driven build state defaults
init_on_alloc: Unpessimize default-on builds
stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall
x86/entry: Enable random_kstack_offset support
arm64: entry: Enable random_kstack_offset support
Makefile | 4 ++++
arch/Kconfig | 23 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 5 ++++
arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 10 ++++++++
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/entry/common.c | 11 +++++++++
include/linux/jump_label.h | 19 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/mm.h | 18 +++++---------
include/linux/randomize_kstack.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
init/main.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 12 ++--------
12 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 19:31 Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-22 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] jump_label: Provide CONFIG-driven build state defaults Kees Cook
2020-06-22 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] init_on_alloc: Unpessimize default-on builds Kees Cook
2020-06-22 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall Kees Cook
2020-06-22 19:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-06-22 21:26 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-22 20:07 ` Jann Horn
2020-06-22 21:30 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-22 21:42 ` Jann Horn
2020-06-22 22:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-22 22:56 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-06-22 23:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-23 0:05 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-06-23 0:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-23 13:42 ` David Laight
2020-06-23 12:38 ` Alexander Popov
2020-06-22 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] x86/entry: Enable random_kstack_offset support Kees Cook
2020-06-22 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: entry: " Kees Cook
2020-06-23 9:40 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200622193146.2985288-1-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox