From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, slab: Fix sign conversion problem in memcg_uncharge_slab()
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:47:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200620184719.10994-1-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
It was found that running the LTP test on a PowerPC system could produce
erroneous values in /proc/meminfo, like:
MemTotal: 531915072 kB
MemFree: 507962176 kB
MemAvailable: 1100020596352 kB
Using bisection, the problem is tracked down to commit 9c315e4d7d8c
("mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab()").
In memcg_uncharge_slab() with a "int order" argument:
unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
:
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, cache_vmstat_idx(s), -nr_pages);
The mod_lruvec_state() function will eventually call the
__mod_zone_page_state() which accepts a long argument. Depending on
the compiler and how inlining is done, "-nr_pages" may be treated as
a negative number or a very large positive number. Apparently, it was
treated as a large positive number in that PowerPC system leading to
incorrect stat counts. This problem hasn't been seen in x86-64 yet,
perhaps the gcc compiler there has some slight difference in behavior.
It is fixed by making nr_pages a signed value. For consistency, a
similar change is applied to memcg_charge_slab() as well.
Fixes: 9c315e4d7d8c ("mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab()").
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
mm/slab.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 207c83ef6e06..74f7e09a7cfd 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
gfp_t gfp, int order,
struct kmem_cache *s)
{
- unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
+ int nr_pages = 1 << order;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
int ret;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
static __always_inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct page *page, int order,
struct kmem_cache *s)
{
- unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
+ int nr_pages = 1 << order;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
--
2.18.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-20 18:47 Waiman Long [this message]
2020-06-20 19:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-20 20:48 ` Waiman Long
2020-06-20 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-20 21:07 ` Waiman Long
2020-06-20 21:12 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200620184719.10994-1-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox