From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D41C433E1 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0AD207E8 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RfZ+mV1y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA0AD207E8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1DB106B0098; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 18C306B009A; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 079D88D0018; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0133.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.133]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E451B6B0098 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF03181AC9C6 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:34:53 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76943184066.25.test55_1706aad26e12 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9441804E3A0 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:34:53 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: test55_1706aad26e12 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5066 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com (mail-lf1-f67.google.com [209.85.167.67]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c11so4067608lfh.8 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Gv0LjjUrQkCQWJP6/3zOSB7ve/Wys452D65ekHlTB94=; b=RfZ+mV1yxnNYOPAxLVJmwYaLdVMQ7pXh5SR/B86DdT6WsHt5FzX/KUjmEHSXFgrAnO TFOMaW8Rdy8WCChz08i/Ii9YTxl8H2xafs2YIXNC3qmkGcCE+OfMZY+APFgyujxgTEoC Tf/ktbPePSI6UHiDkF0m2q542Dtic1woZ5mfl4oOTRc7Sq7q5VbPT7UHwccrbtBUrcP9 n6KnEifDu/Ri2NVbU+vohE7T64HxiqQJLWxH8daXK2NOZjB4bMwe+Rpza3wKcQaGxGiR PiIlihQDTzd4R2BXzLtfQ7UoImF0/hCvoA4uL8zf+4KvonpWDhcS6WZl5QBz432AITw1 ymRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Gv0LjjUrQkCQWJP6/3zOSB7ve/Wys452D65ekHlTB94=; b=aGcaJs5UYokMMZR4bRlrp29CosMS9Ue1xVCATG8nd22YsLcZGu503Bujcg9aVuuLo4 olNaru9M1vDxwrlHpkGKnOldk44CLlgOz6unkV/e7jyoSP+IIbJpR2GKYQ2+M8XgYTPd wXU8RNMLC6uxN7aZvSicLxsHdMu/Uk3rostW6+e35CyjDEJ5rrh6EYBnbnUgy/1kd7jR LepMWTNtOSbJZXMMM7Z953dFO3aiZys2X+uyJtfOzumqQYWBFwy6ZB52EtL/JiRWfESk MzCtaSDtAQCHaIRXWudPOEx0XwTVyZpHCuXDu3IQQaanB2QFYO2tjzpQQlPrbz2yyOpo bH3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335PrBx+H/AJGEtAQtX+pHa4tlmCAhT/z4N1mlgSUKr9qGNhVfM 0gMfmX4WgiQ1bOoMOPYzE2M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzp8dVNQyuS7FXPMgAmvsheR5wu2JOMKlnEtzuj17yMDsLqHd6i16PlGUAtaRP59H30c7jywQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:8253:: with SMTP id e80mr3136304lfd.199.1592505291079; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11sm908156lfz.78.2020.06.18.11.34.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:34:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:34:48 +0200 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , Matthew Wilcox , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Joel Fernandes , RCU , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs Message-ID: <20200618183448.GA15136@pc636> References: <20200525214800.93072-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200525214800.93072-10-urezki@gmail.com> <20200617234609.GA10087@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200618005214.GN8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200618031823.GQ2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200618173520.GC14613@pc636> <20200618175719.GT2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200618175719.GT2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1F9441804E3A0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > > > > > > I suspect that he would like to keep the tracing. > > > > > > It might be worth trying the branches, given that they would be constant > > > and indexed by "i". The compiler might well remove the indirection. > > > > > > The compiler guys brag about doing so, which of course might or might > > > not have any correlation to a given compiler actually doing so. :-/ > > > > > > Having a vfree_bulk() might well be useful, but I would feel more > > > confidence in that if there were other callers of kfree_bulk(). > > > > > Hmm... I think replacing that with vfree_bulk() is a good idea though. > > In other words, get rid of kfree_bulk() in favor of vfree_bulk()? > kfree_bulk() does not understand vmalloc memory. vfree_bulk() should be implemented to release vmalloc's pointers. On i high level it will be used the same way as kfree_bulk() but for vmalloc ptrs. only. > > > But again, either way, future work as far as this series is concerned. > > > > > What do you mean: is concerned? > > Apologies for the strange English. How about this? > > "This series is OK as is. Any comments above did not prevent me from > taking these patches, but instead discuss possible future work." > That is perfectly clear to me :) > > We are planning to implement kfree_rcu() to be integrated directly into > > SLAB: SLAB, SLUB, SLOB. So, there are plenty of future work :) > > And I am glad that this is still the goal. ;-) > :) -- Vlad Rezki