From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm, slab/slub: move and improve cache_from_obj()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:59:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006181258.55DA8F6@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afeda7ac-748b-33d8-a905-56b708148ad5@suse.cz>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:10:38PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 6/17/20 7:49 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:31:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> The function cache_from_obj() was added by commit b9ce5ef49f00 ("sl[au]b:
> >> always get the cache from its page in kmem_cache_free()") to support kmemcg,
> >> where per-memcg cache can be different from the root one, so we can't use
> >> the kmem_cache pointer given to kmem_cache_free().
> >>
> >> Prior to that commit, SLUB already had debugging check+warning that could be
> >> enabled to compare the given kmem_cache pointer to one referenced by the slab
> >> page where the object-to-be-freed resides. This check was moved to
> >> cache_from_obj(). Later the check was also enabled for SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
> >> configs by commit 598a0717a816 ("mm/slab: validate cache membership under
> >> freelist hardening").
> >>
> >> These checks and warnings can be useful especially for the debugging, which can
> >> be improved. Commit 598a0717a816 changed the pr_err() with WARN_ON_ONCE() to
> >> WARN_ONCE() so only the first hit is now reported, others are silent. This
> >> patch changes it to WARN() so that all errors are reported.
> >>
> >> It's also useful to print SLUB allocation/free tracking info for the offending
> >> object, if tracking is enabled. We could export the SLUB print_tracking()
> >> function and provide an empty one for SLAB, or realize that both the debugging
> >> and hardening cases in cache_from_obj() are only supported by SLUB anyway. So
> >> this patch moves cache_from_obj() from slab.h to separate instances in slab.c
> >> and slub.c, where the SLAB version only does the kmemcg lookup and even could
> >
> > Oops. I made a mistake when I applied CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
> > here, I was thinking of SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM's coverage (SLUB and SLAB),
> > and I see now that I never updated CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED to
> > cover SLAB and SLOB.
> >
> > The point being: I still want the sanity check for the SLAB case under
> > hardening. This needs to stay a common function. The whole point is
> > to catch corruption from the wrong kmem_cache * being associated with
> > an object, and that's agnostic of slab/slub/slob.
> >
> > So, I'll send a follow-up to this patch to actually do what I had
> > originally intended for 598a0717a816 ("mm/slab: validate cache membership
> > under freelist hardening"), which wasn't intended to be SLUB-specific.
>
> To prvent the churn of your patch moving the cache_from_obj() back to slab.h, I
> think it's best if we modify my patch. The patch below should be squashed into
> the current version in mmots, with the commit log used for the whole result.
>
> This will cause conflicts while reapplying Roman's
> mm-memcg-slab-use-a-single-set-of-kmem_caches-for-all-allocations.patch which
> can be fixed by
> a) throwing away the conflicting hunks for cache_from_obj() in slab.c and slub.c
> b) applying this hunk instead:
>
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -455,12 +455,11 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *cache_from_obj(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
> struct kmem_cache *cachep;
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED) &&
> - !memcg_kmem_enabled() &&
> !kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS))
> return s;
>
> cachep = virt_to_cache(x);
> - if (WARN(cachep && !slab_equal_or_root(cachep, s),
> + if (WARN(cachep && cachep != s,
> "%s: Wrong slab cache. %s but object is from %s\n",
> __func__, s->name, cachep->name))
> print_tracking(cachep, x);
>
> The fixup patch itself:
> ----8<----
> From b8df607d92b37e5329ce7bda62b2b364cc249893 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:52:03 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, slab/slub: improve error reporting and overhead of
> cache_from_obj()
>
> The function cache_from_obj() was added by commit b9ce5ef49f00 ("sl[au]b:
> always get the cache from its page in kmem_cache_free()") to support
> kmemcg, where per-memcg cache can be different from the root one, so we
> can't use the kmem_cache pointer given to kmem_cache_free().
>
> Prior to that commit, SLUB already had debugging check+warning that could
> be enabled to compare the given kmem_cache pointer to one referenced by
> the slab page where the object-to-be-freed resides. This check was moved
> to cache_from_obj(). Later the check was also enabled for
> SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED configs by commit 598a0717a816 ("mm/slab: validate
> cache membership under freelist hardening").
>
> These checks and warnings can be useful especially for the debugging,
> which can be improved. Commit 598a0717a816 changed the pr_err() with
> WARN_ON_ONCE() to WARN_ONCE() so only the first hit is now reported,
> others are silent. This patch changes it to WARN() so that all errors are
> reported.
>
> It's also useful to print SLUB allocation/free tracking info for the offending
> object, if tracking is enabled. Thus, export the SLUB print_tracking() function
> and provide an empty one for SLAB.
>
> For SLUB we can also benefit from the static key check in
> kmem_cache_debug_flags(), but we need to move this function to slab.h and
> declare the static key there.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608230654.828134-18-guro@fb.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
I will rebase my fix for SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED coverage on this.
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 16:31 [PATCH 0/9] slub_debug fixes and improvements Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm, slub: extend slub_debug syntax for multiple blocks Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, slub: make some slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm, slub: remove runtime allocation order changes Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, slub: make remaining slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, slub: make reclaim_account attribute read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, slub: introduce static key for slub_debug() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 21:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, slub: introduce kmem_cache_debug_flags() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 8:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 8:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 19:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-18 19:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, slub: extend checks guarded by slub_debug static key Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, slab/slub: move and improve cache_from_obj() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-11 9:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-11 20:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 10:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 19:59 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-18 20:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-19 19:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-24 7:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202006181258.55DA8F6@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox