From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
arnd@arndb.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
christian@brauner.io, cyphar@cyphar.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
geert@linux-m68k.org, gor@linux.ibm.com,
ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, jolsa@redhat.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, lkp@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mattst88@gmail.com, minchan@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
monstr@monstr.eu, namhyung@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
rth@twiddle.net, sargun@sargun.me, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
tony.luck@intel.com, will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alex.huangjianhui@huawei.com, zhongjubin@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:27:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618112702.GB4231@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618110320.104013-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:03:20PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> Build error on s390:
> arch/s390/kernel/entry.o: in function `sys_call_table_emu':
> >> (.rodata+0x1288): undefined reference to `__s390_'
>
> In commit ("All arch: remove system call sys_sysctl")
> 148 common fdatasync sys_fdatasync sys_fdatasync
> -149 common _sysctl sys_sysctl compat_sys_sysctl
> +149 common _sysctl sys_ni_syscall
> 150 common mlock sys_mlock sys_mlock
>
> After the patch is integrated, there is a format error in the generated
> arch/s390/include/generated/asm/syscall_table.h:
> SYSCALL(sys_fdatasync, sys_fdatasync)
> SYSCALL(sys_ni_syscall,) /* cause build error */
> SYSCALL(sys_mlock,sys_mlock)
>
> There are holes in the system call number in
> arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl. When generating syscall_table.h,
> these hole numbers will be automatically filled with "NI_SYSCALL".
> Therefore, delete the number 149 to fix the current compilation failure.
> Similarly, modify tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl.
>
> Fixes: ("All arch: remove system call sys_sysctl")
> Fixes: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200616030734.87257-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 -
> tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index f17aaf6fe5de..bcaf93994e3c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@
> 146 common writev sys_writev compat_sys_writev
> 147 common getsid sys_getsid sys_getsid
> 148 common fdatasync sys_fdatasync sys_fdatasync
> -149 common _sysctl sys_ni_syscall
This is not correct. It should be changed to:
149 common _sysctl - -
Otherwise the generated __NR__sysctl define will be lost from
unistd.h, which should not happen. Looking at the link above it
_looks_ like a similar mistake was done for arm64.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 0193f9b98753..eb77d0d01d8f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@
> 146 common writev sys_writev compat_sys_writev
> 147 common getsid sys_getsid sys_getsid
> 148 common fdatasync sys_fdatasync sys_fdatasync
> -149 common _sysctl sys_ni_syscall
Same here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 11:03 Xiaoming Ni
2020-06-18 11:27 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2020-06-18 11:52 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-18 13:49 ` Xiaoming Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618112702.GB4231@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.huangjianhui@huawei.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhongjubin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox