From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] slub_debug fixes and improvements
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:31:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610163135.17364-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
this series puts together the recent series "replace runtime slub_debug
toggling with more capable boot parameter" [4] (no longer RFC, thanks for
reviews), with older RFC [5] to introduce a static key for slub_debug. It's
because the removal of runtime toggling makes the static key addition simpler.
The last patch improves cache_from_obj() based on recent debugging effort [6].
We had recently reports [1,2] of troubles with runtime writes to various SLUB
per-cache sysfs files related to slub_debug or tuning leading to crashes. I have
inspected all those writable files and the rather unfortunate result is that
most of them are made read-only by this patchset, as fixing the issues doesn't
seem viable. Details for each are given in each patch (2-5)
The runtime toggles were however necessary for the use case described in [3],
so the first patch extends the slub_debug boot parameter syntax to achieve the
same configuration without runtime toggles. That should hopefully make the
changes more feasible.
Patches 6-9 reduce slub_debug overhead in cases where it's compiled in but not
enabled during boot, with a static key. Patch 9 also improves bug reporting
in cache_from_obj().
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1580379523-32272-1-git-send-email-vjitta@codeaurora.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAG48ez31PP--h6_FzVyfJ4H86QYczAFPdxtJHUEEan+7VJETAQ@mail.gmail.com
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1383cd32-1ddc-4dac-b5f8-9c42282fa81c@codeaurora.org
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200602141519.7099-1-vbabka@suse.cz
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190404091531.9815-1-vbabka@suse.cz
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/r/4dc93ff8-f86e-f4c9-ebeb-6d3153a78d03@oracle.com
Vlastimil Babka (9):
mm, slub: extend slub_debug syntax for multiple blocks
mm, slub: make some slub_debug related attributes read-only
mm, slub: remove runtime allocation order changes
mm, slub: make remaining slub_debug related attributes read-only
mm, slub: make reclaim_account attribute read-only
mm, slub: introduce static key for slub_debug()
mm, slub: introduce kmem_cache_debug_flags()
mm, slub: extend checks guarded by slub_debug static key
mm, slab/slub: move and improve cache_from_obj()
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/vm/slub.rst | 37 +-
mm/slab.c | 8 +
mm/slab.h | 23 --
mm/slub.c | 374 +++++++++---------
5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 16:31 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm, slub: extend slub_debug syntax for multiple blocks Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, slub: make some slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm, slub: remove runtime allocation order changes Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, slub: make remaining slub_debug related attributes read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, slub: make reclaim_account attribute read-only Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, slub: introduce static key for slub_debug() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 21:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, slub: introduce kmem_cache_debug_flags() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 8:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 8:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 19:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-18 19:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, slub: extend checks guarded by slub_debug static key Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-10 16:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, slab/slub: move and improve cache_from_obj() Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-10 22:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-11 9:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-11 20:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-17 17:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 10:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-06-18 19:59 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 20:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-19 19:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-24 7:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200610163135.17364-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox