From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83180C433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45277207F9 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="o19yJT5y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 45277207F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E4B526B0007; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:31:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DFBF06B0072; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:31:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D13BE6B0073; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:31:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0225.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.225]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69656B0007 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:31:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7540680175CE for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76908398826.10.mine34_2b0c98226dbf Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3169616A4C6 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:13 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: mine34_2b0c98226dbf X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5043 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCBDB20810; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:31:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591677072; bh=8jpg8X7ELOXw1DXqzKGCWhic/MDTYK02QeTvqteYQpc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=o19yJT5y0zEf4QQoOOef3jfCmI57b5FtkFo9C+JG+m97lpbUXVB8NttSjF0E4XMT9 rOhINP/svjG7JWZwYvVew6dkgTB8yFSf4SYD64D2yPpadv//G/EHqETadcMKRpEJZG DuueFJ6EtJdykG3dmblIpV24UbifcFFB2D/X+U0Y= Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 21:31:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, deller@gmx.de, dima@arista.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: [patch 25/93] parisc: add show_stack_loglvl() Message-ID: <20200609043111.YZa81OjRw%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200608212922.5b7fa74ca3f4e2444441b7f9@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3169616A4C6 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Dmitry Safonov Subject: parisc: add show_stack_loglvl() Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-26-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov Cc: Helge Deller Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/parisc/kernel/traps.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/traps.c~parisc-add-show_stack_loglvl +++ a/arch/parisc/kernel/traps.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ #include "../math-emu/math-emu.h" /* for handle_fpe() */ static void parisc_show_stack(struct task_struct *task, - struct pt_regs *regs); + struct pt_regs *regs, const char *loglvl); static int printbinary(char *buf, unsigned long x, int nbits) { @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) printk("%s IAOQ[1]: %pS\n", level, (void *) regs->iaoq[1]); printk("%s RP(r2): %pS\n", level, (void *) regs->gr[2]); - parisc_show_stack(current, regs); + parisc_show_stack(current, regs, KERN_DEFAULT); } } @@ -170,37 +170,43 @@ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_hppa_rs, } -static void do_show_stack(struct unwind_frame_info *info) +static void do_show_stack(struct unwind_frame_info *info, const char *loglvl) { int i = 1; - printk(KERN_CRIT "Backtrace:\n"); + printk("%sBacktrace:\n", loglvl); while (i <= MAX_UNWIND_ENTRIES) { if (unwind_once(info) < 0 || info->ip == 0) break; if (__kernel_text_address(info->ip)) { - printk(KERN_CRIT " [<" RFMT ">] %pS\n", - info->ip, (void *) info->ip); + printk("%s [<" RFMT ">] %pS\n", + loglvl, info->ip, (void *) info->ip); i++; } } - printk(KERN_CRIT "\n"); + printk("%s\n", loglvl); } static void parisc_show_stack(struct task_struct *task, - struct pt_regs *regs) + struct pt_regs *regs, const char *loglvl) { struct unwind_frame_info info; unwind_frame_init_task(&info, task, regs); - do_show_stack(&info); + do_show_stack(&info, loglvl); +} + +void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long *sp, + const char *loglvl) +{ + parisc_show_stack(t, NULL, loglvl); } void show_stack(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long *sp) { - parisc_show_stack(t, NULL); + show_stack_loglvl(t, sp, KERN_CRIT) } int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long iaoq) @@ -446,7 +452,7 @@ void parisc_terminate(char *msg, struct /* show_stack(NULL, (unsigned long *)regs->gr[30]); */ struct unwind_frame_info info; unwind_frame_init(&info, current, regs); - do_show_stack(&info); + do_show_stack(&info, KERN_CRIT); } printk("\n"); _