From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
bigeasy@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/16] rcu/tree: Keep kfree_rcu() awake during lock contention
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:47:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525214800.93072-2-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525214800.93072-1-urezki@gmail.com>
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
On PREEMPT_RT kernels, the krcp spinlock gets converted to an rt-mutex
and causes kfree_rcu() callers to sleep. This makes it unusable for
callers in purely atomic sections such as non-threaded IRQ handlers and
raw spinlock sections. Fix it by converting the spinlock to a raw
spinlock.
Vetting all code paths, there is no reason to believe that the raw
spinlock will hurt RT latencies as it is not held for a long time.
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6e120be29332..6e967a9d6704 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu {
struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data *bhead;
struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data *bcached;
struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work krw_arr[KFREE_N_BATCHES];
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct delayed_work monitor_work;
bool monitor_todo;
bool initialized;
@@ -2915,12 +2915,12 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
krwp = container_of(to_rcu_work(work),
struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work, rcu_work);
krcp = krwp->krcp;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
head = krwp->head_free;
krwp->head_free = NULL;
bhead = krwp->bhead_free;
krwp->bhead_free = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
/* "bhead" is now private, so traverse locklessly. */
for (; bhead; bhead = bnext) {
@@ -3023,14 +3023,14 @@ static inline void kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
krcp->monitor_todo = false;
if (queue_kfree_rcu_work(krcp)) {
// Success! Our job is done here.
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
return;
}
// Previous RCU batch still in progress, try again later.
krcp->monitor_todo = true;
schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -3043,11 +3043,11 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = container_of(work, struct kfree_rcu_cpu,
monitor_work.work);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (krcp->monitor_todo)
kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(krcp, flags);
else
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
static inline bool
@@ -3118,7 +3118,7 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
local_irq_save(flags); // For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().
krcp = this_cpu_ptr(&krc);
if (krcp->initialized)
- spin_lock(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&krcp->lock);
// Queue the object but don't yet schedule the batch.
if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) {
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
unlock_return:
if (krcp->initialized)
- spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
@@ -3181,11 +3181,11 @@ kfree_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
count = krcp->count;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (krcp->monitor_todo)
kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(krcp, flags);
else
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
sc->nr_to_scan -= count;
freed += count;
@@ -3212,15 +3212,15 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (!krcp->head || krcp->monitor_todo) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
continue;
}
krcp->monitor_todo = true;
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &krcp->monitor_work,
KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
}
@@ -4113,7 +4113,7 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
- spin_lock_init(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&krcp->lock);
for (i = 0; i < KFREE_N_BATCHES; i++) {
INIT_RCU_WORK(&krcp->krw_arr[i].rcu_work, kfree_rcu_work);
krcp->krw_arr[i].krcp = krcp;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-25 21:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] Introduce kvfree_rcu(1 or 2 arguments) Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] rcu/tree: Skip entry into the page allocator for PREEMPT_RT Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] rcu/tree: Repeat the monitor if any free channel is busy Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] rcu/tree: Make debug_objects logic independent of rcu_head Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] rcu/tree: Simplify KFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR macro Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] rcu/tree: Move kfree_rcu_cpu locking/unlocking to separate functions Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-06-17 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 0:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 3:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 18:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 19:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 20:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 20:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 21:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 21:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 15:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-19 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-22 19:04 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-22 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-30 17:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 20:03 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] rcu/tiny: support vmalloc in tiny-RCU Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] rcu: Rename *_kfree_callback/*_kfree_rcu_offset/kfree_call_* Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] rcu: Introduce 2 arg kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] rcu: Support reclaim for head-less object Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] rcu: Introduce single argument kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Add test cases for kvfree_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200525214800.93072-2-urezki@gmail.com \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox