From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD94C54E8E for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8719720736 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FDNc3WJa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8719720736 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DC4BB9000B3; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:25:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D743A900036; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:25:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C61F99000B3; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:25:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0085.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.85]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC11900036 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:25:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1CE4995E2 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:25:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76808138652.06.play86_86c41bee75325 X-HE-Tag: play86_86c41bee75325 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4633 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com (mail-qk1-f193.google.com [209.85.222.193]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id g185so13461590qke.7 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 06:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PTFxC40Ec7wOMd+ERavExEghGhS6XBq7Wvj2fntglJ8=; b=FDNc3WJa0vcrIlXtpcLbJPEaHig6WYKGXLTihc5rLW4Tn+74OO99gK4BHreesy1ChH SC++AU7M8QcXLivZnsUyba7/CKQp5QHeH8x8ErzhuMiVTXM+aAxN7tbY2CtOUE+1jXWy QU3jhaZOLsHZw1Suudr7VLD+FYipFu/z6+6zO3/Ub5WbDJ5BsRpXTUaLJ8s7H4Nmk2y2 sNHLjeYp/Z4VcDlAKwu3npXk/EXLKV+UdHeEYXbeaKJQOoblqk1Bz3iVz1W8SaTPJ6dm xfvM09tdptP49PnjyL/56fp5zzMY/iAab+1OfbdRzHsoRzoe3uIZkVjVLGoBnh1gWDTn BS8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PTFxC40Ec7wOMd+ERavExEghGhS6XBq7Wvj2fntglJ8=; b=ONjP+6h6mH4IbLF7bjdcgpt2bYBmeUwwX91h+8JGAPxZRGFhokGNMXZ6aXnUIR4XL1 SelhOJeXiHaIpKfM6OwY26Wdw6hGDR2rR03eqHxbSd7XBmZRF3zRGSxfZ1Xv6dYq70hs 4gxhcvrPQGfIHrFt1miunmmYEhzPEh5IGpEGVJSt52BKs2xQQDZvJTpKYqUKN61GUxZA c0Z7IzkLJcZ8yEK4x9x2Oic3dOM0LMbr+b49r3W3LPu8WYEpBRobhkxCs+oXnKNYt4Ms u1uQyQyS4mflJUnvQQXqAJh5txIdK8vLXL8HrZO2lufnAoeeRInpLE4O2lQYcWQ1PU3O JQjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY8V0C+PaWWfEhz1xBnQot8SLSUpOD/PhZTuCFYo6Mv9+m/c8V3 Vgl1rql/OGUaL0VSSNGGsXU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI+IJe+b1HpMdplJFp4nSZpTbaseSeCUJP03m5Kbkzx8bpdPe3PliatUtIW59Y6CcU0JB5hmg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9ec4:: with SMTP id h187mr20924117qke.72.1589289925201; Tue, 12 May 2020 06:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dschatzberg-fedora-PC0Y6AEN.dhcp.thefacebook.com ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:4fca]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm12033182qti.33.2020.05.12.06.25.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2020 06:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:25:21 -0400 From: Dan Schatzberg To: Jens Axboe , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Amir Goldstein , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Chris Down , Yang Shi , Ingo Molnar , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Mathieu Desnoyers , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrea Arcangeli , Thomas Gleixner , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , open list , "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" , "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" , "open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup Message-ID: <20200512132521.GA28700@dschatzberg-fedora-PC0Y6AEN.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20200428161355.6377-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428161355.6377-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Seems like discussion on this patch series has died down. There's been a concern raised that we could generalize infrastructure across loop, md, etc. This may be possible, in the future, but it isn't clear to me how this would look like. I'm inclined to fix the existing issue with loop devices now (this is a problem we hit at FB) and address consolidation with other cases if and when those are addressed. Jens, you've expressed interest in seeing this series go through the block tree so I'm interested in your perspective here. Barring any concrete implementation bugs, would you be okay merging this version?