From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vinmenon@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: reset the zone->watermark_boost early
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:11:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511131155.0b40ee443c3367e8f748b16f@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589204408-5152-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 11 May 2020 19:10:08 +0530 Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Updating the zone watermarks by any means, like extra_free_kbytes,
> min_free_kbytes, water_mark_scale_factor e.t.c, when watermark_boost is
> set will result into the higher low and high watermarks than the user
> asks. This can be avoided by resetting the zone->watermark_boost to zero
> early.
Does this solve some problem which has been observed in testing?
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7746,9 +7746,9 @@ static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
> mult_frac(zone_managed_pages(zone),
> watermark_scale_factor, 10000));
>
> + zone->watermark_boost = 0;
> zone->_watermark[WMARK_LOW] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + tmp;
> zone->_watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + tmp * 2;
> - zone->watermark_boost = 0;
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
> }
This could only be a problem if code is accessing these things without
holding zone->lock. Is that ever the case?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 13:40 Charan Teja Reddy
2020-05-11 20:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-05-12 13:31 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2020-05-13 9:46 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2020-05-13 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200511131155.0b40ee443c3367e8f748b16f@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=charante@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox