From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02898C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 05:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4F320736 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 05:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JEt/YWBs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D4F320736 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C3600900003; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BE709900002; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:25:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B2307900003; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:25:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0080.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.80]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B99900002 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5904249960B for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 05:25:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76792413684.30.arm60_4bf63ee32a14c X-HE-Tag: arm60_4bf63ee32a14c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5597 Received: from mail-pj1-f66.google.com (mail-pj1-f66.google.com [209.85.216.66]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 05:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f66.google.com with SMTP id ms17so3726660pjb.0 for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9IeR0dPIZ0OSH1nDVp4aq1ocjhKQA4jjQmxGl9svfns=; b=JEt/YWBsrJWXu7RSgfB3u8DzeGhvEtALzRWNAOZQdCVWq/cYV0ooYRYenkbnAGT+NL cznhO+TRRLE548xl0BlY4QaubmyDumCQ0DOidh7XepFwKYi96LNs5SNKqvYabBzP0h9D 7sWNK+YgysJL/+f7tIDS/RxtOPCB1jimoYYQoPERbwBJl3PnPQ7KqmVNvDHOe0SpbxsG dNJMh7L/wsRAYOras0jVen2LOSDguqPcMFHJP1X53UPqfcI/p2S/xNBZA0NtKd9maaFx 1QT+SH4Bztd4wIAETKcUSfp0Wnyaw41fCGYp8btM2EIcgJgDIBh83sIzX8qAWHGwNXlA h9pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9IeR0dPIZ0OSH1nDVp4aq1ocjhKQA4jjQmxGl9svfns=; b=c6AMzwysuuuZubDUI/U7fiAqA5HN70j0JeJZ6p6Y2VlNd6e2cVjOa7cJ1BE4XyidDq en2JnNFPgxOkIsboW8MZYs0PMnjGTWJsqwomKAcwCZcnEg17ppOnqfaFu4B3M8OChLmY wXKdBIzIL0nIXWGHuZmhRBWcmM4IFJRuBvlaNSLDMW+26ZhpC7Lyjwrga6Nwn2ONfDev wve0YFz/md9nLfmvFykUaGZWS1SF6iNZbLiMQKMtmBdjMsFdZO0hrpUtONwUn8ExK/jM kcSizNN2SbFLQl1P8vInv/eYhCEDNJQcI8r5rF0Kv0zh/aazPcMa9Z/1+n5MFERzeh4o Soaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuahVcQdowzAjXgCR5I9vTH7C8Ot6RMFs4DaN2YhEpA1v8O8LpfZ +KO6y3y5vEOkwlBoe/qkmow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKWdsi+GVELwhks5cVj3anSM7iqelsqlFFINWPwGpfHQIcaZ6M9tsz5t2DyLq2UnYyCyYD91g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7281:: with SMTP id d1mr798634pll.78.1588915520606; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:1:3e01:2939:5992:52da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm536850pfq.16.2020.05.07.22.25.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 May 2020 22:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:25:17 -0700 From: Minchan Kim To: kbuild test robot Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 6698/6711] :1520:2: warning: #warning syscall process_madvise not implemented Message-ID: <20200508052517.GA197378@google.com> References: <202005080716.cUcbCQ3i%lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202005080716.cUcbCQ3i%lkp@intel.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:37:19AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: 7def1ef0f72c3ebe3e42467d2f73c4e56153fa49 > commit: db22c0ad9503eda042475aca2675cdce55249b4b [6698/6711] mm/madvise: introduce process_madvise() syscall: an external memory hinting API > config: mips-ip27_defconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: mips64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce: > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > git checkout db22c0ad9503eda042475aca2675cdce55249b4b > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=mips > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> :1520:2: warning: #warning syscall process_madvise not implemented [-Wcpp] > -- > >> :1520:2: warning: #warning syscall process_madvise not implemented [-Wcpp] > -- > >> :1520:2: warning: #warning syscall process_madvise not implemented [-Wcpp] > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Thanks for the report. This patch should fix it. >From 2b93b6abc2a32683cdccb6f109617e1a597466c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Minchan Kim Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:18:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix build error for mips of process_madvise kbuild test rebot reported build break of process_madvise for mips[1]. This patch should fix it. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202005080716.cUcbCQ3i%25lkp@intel.com/ Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim --- arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl index ac586774c980..940c7f49a731 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl @@ -425,3 +425,4 @@ 435 o32 clone3 __sys_clone3 437 o32 openat2 sys_openat2 438 o32 pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd +439 o32 process_madvise sys_process_madvise compat_sys_process_madvise -- 2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog