linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:29:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505072931.GE16322@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504160345.45801b7bf199ac5897e2572a@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon 04-05-20 16:03:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat,  2 May 2020 10:10:55 -0400 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > A recent commit 9852ae3fe529 ("mm, memcg: consider subtrees in
> > memory.events") changes the behavior of memcg events, which will
> > consider subtrees in memory.events. But oom_kill event is a special one
> > as it is used in both cgroup1 and cgroup2. In cgroup1, it is displayed
> > in memory.oom_control. The file memory.oom_control is in both root memcg
> > and non root memcg, that is different with memory.event as it only in
> > non-root memcg. That commit is okay for cgroup2, but it is not okay for
> > cgroup1 as it will cause inconsistent behavior between root memcg and
> > non-root memcg.
> > 
> > Here's an example on why this behavior is inconsistent in cgroup1.
> >      root memcg
> >      /
> >   memcg foo
> >    /
> > memcg bar
> > 
> > Suppose there's an oom_kill in memcg bar, then the oon_kill will be
> > 
> >      root memcg : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  0
> >      /
> >   memcg foo : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  1
> >    /
> > memcg bar : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  1
> > 
> > For the non-root memcg, its memory.oom_control(oom_kill) includes its
> > descendants' oom_kill, but for root memcg, it doesn't include its
> > descendants' oom_kill. That means, memory.oom_control(oom_kill) has
> > different meanings in different memcgs. That is inconsistent. Then the user
> > has to know whether the memcg is root or not.
> > 
> > If we can't fully support it in cgroup1, for example by adding
> > memory.events.local into cgroup1 as well, then let's don't touch
> > its original behavior.
> > 
> > Fixes: 9852ae3fe529 ("mm, memcg: consider subtrees in memory.events")
> 
> Nearly a year ago.  Should we backport this into earlier kernels?

It is a trivial change so I do not see problem marking it for stable.

> 
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -783,6 +783,8 @@ static inline void memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >  		atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events[event]);
> >  		cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_file);
> >  
> > +		if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> > +			break;
> >  		if (cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS)
> >  			break;
> >  	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-02 14:10 Yafang Shao
2020-05-02 14:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-02 15:23 ` Chris Down
2020-05-04  7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-04 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2020-05-05  7:29   ` Michal Hocko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200505072931.GE16322@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox