From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not high throttle allocators based on wraparound
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:39:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415043911.GA147015@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331152424.GA1019937@chrisdown.name>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 04:24:24PM +0100, Chris Down wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>
> If a cgroup violates its memory.high constraints, we may end
> up unduly penalising it. For example, for the following hierarchy:
>
> A: max high, 20 usage
> A/B: 9 high, 10 usage
> A/C: max high, 10 usage
>
> We would end up doing the following calculation below when calculating
> high delay for A/B:
>
> A/B: 10 - 9 = 1...
> A: 20 - PAGE_COUNTER_MAX = 21, so set max_overage to 21.
>
> This gets worse with higher disparities in usage in the parent.
>
> I have no idea how this disappeared from the final version of the patch,
> but it is certainly Not Good(tm). This wasn't obvious in testing
> because, for a simple cgroup hierarchy with only one child, the result
> is usually roughly the same. It's only in more complex hierarchies that
> things go really awry (although still, the effects are limited to a
> maximum of 2 seconds in schedule_timeout_killable at a maximum).
>
> [chris@chrisdown.name: changelog]
>
> Fixes: e26733e0d0ec ("mm, memcg: throttle allocators based on ancestral memory.high")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4.x
Oops.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-31 15:24 Chris Down
2020-03-31 15:25 ` Chris Down
2020-03-31 15:57 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-31 17:04 ` Chris Down
2020-03-31 19:00 ` Chris Down
2020-04-15 4:39 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200415043911.GA147015@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox